Al Franken, a mere 200 votes behind the official tally in the U.S. Senate race against incumbent Republican Norm Coleman, will likely be declared victor after the completion of a hand recount within the next couple of weeks. Nate Silver, a baseball statistician-turned-political pollster has done some analysis of the ballots most likely to be skipped by the machine count. Usually machines disqualify what are known as “under-votes,” in which the voter may make a clear mark to indicate support for the candidate but in a somewhat incorrect manner, such as circling the name instead of filling the line next to the name etc. Traditionally, undervotes come from low-income neighborhoods or precincts with large elderly populations.
By Jack Craver
Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:56 p.m.
Updated Thursday, November 13, 2008 12:07:19 a.m.
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Related stories:
- Minnesota race could be decided by coin toss (December 4, 2008)
- Oil In Wisconsin? (June 7, 2008)
- Redskins losing, and why it matters (November 3, 2008)
- Suri resigns from athletic board, implies sexism and racism (October 20, 2008)
Also by Jack Craver:
2 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment




IP hash: dffced53
If people are too stupid to be able to vote correctly their votes shouldn’t count. It’s not rocket science.
IP hash: c6f1a5ce
I am told that in Wisconsin, the machine tells you if you have made an error, so how can a manual re-count change the machine count? We are fed up with “voter intent”, a liberal desperation to steal an election. They tried it in Fla and lost. Ironic that history blames the Reps.