Muckrakers

Muckrakers

Plan 2008, or Plain Racist?

Diversity; Climate; Plan 2008: buzz words as of late. The administration here at UW-Madison seems obsessed with their little social experiments and their preferential admission standards. They think that the one thing missing from our education is more minority classmates. To paraphrase State Senator Glenn Grothman, they think students don’t know how to get along with people of color. They are racist, for they assume that a difference in skin pigmentation necessitates a difference in character that us white students have to learn to accept. They are bigoted, for they assume that we somehow have to acclimate ourselves to interacting with minorities as if 2008 was no different than 1954.

Instead of simply focusing on recruiting the best and brightest students, the administration laments that they need to make minority students more competitive for admission. With mixed results at the expiration of Plan 2008, especially in regards to minority student retention, the administration is obsessed with forming a new plan to garner even more colored people as students. Do they think that the University of Wisconsin is some drawing on a refrigerator or something, and that black, yellow, red, and brown are the crayons missing from their Crayola box necessary to create a picture of perverted social perfection in their liberal eyes in order to achieve some gold star?

When one looks at the numbers, it is hard to believe the administration is still whining that we need more diversity in the student body. The freshman class of 2008 was composed of 13.3 percent minorities. In their report, the office of admissions seems a little dismayed by this number, but it is arguable that this number is slightly high considering that UW-Madison is a state ran university, and thus, it is suppose to be representative of the state population. Cry all you want that 13.3 percent of the freshman class of 2008 is too few minorities, but the state, according to 2008 figures, is still 89.7 percent white.

It is undeniably racially preferential for the University of Wisconsin to pursue an increase in the racial diversity of admitted students rather than judging applicants solely on their academic competence and non-demographically based criteria especially considering that current admission statistics show that the university’s student body is already representative of the state population as a whole. What the administration deems academic enrichment is really liberal social doctrine, racist in the name of equality, feeding us students pc ignorance as a creed to live by and insulting our intelligence and character.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

user-pic

Last time I checked Milwaukee was still part of Wisconsin and happens to be one of the most segregated cities in the country… and the public schools in Milwaukee are not all created equal. Students from some areas of Milwaukee are not able to receive the same education as students in other areas. This means that even though they may not have the same grades or the ACT scores they still deserve a chance at the great education that a school like the UW can provide. There is also a lot of research that gives possible answers to your questions about retention if you had bothered to look for answers. These are all arguments against your main premise; however, what bothers me the most about your argument is the lack of understanding of what minorities experience here in Madison. While it may not be 1954, racism is still very much a reality even on our liberal campus… and perhaps, just maybe, it might help to have people meet new and different people they have never met before.

user-pic

Milwaukee segregated? Hah. Hardly. And what does Milwaukee have to do with the greater demographics of Wisconsin anyway?

The columnist hit the nail on the head. Dead on.

user-pic

MIlwaukee’s not segregated? What, are you from Spooner?

Leave a comment

To comment anonymously or if signed in, leave name and e-mail blank.

Donate