Governor Doyle’s veto of the regent bill is not an effort to ensure a UW system/state wide focus among citizen regents. It is an effort to maintain cronyism on the board. If seven plus one equals eight, and thus, the balance in favor of Milwaukee and Madison areas that currently defines the membership of the board of regents can persist. Having seven geographically diverse regents wouldn’t result in a geographic divide among regents. The real issue that Doyle sees is an inability to have the board of regents pander to his whim. Infamous for raiding the UW system’s budget, Doyle wants to ensure executive privilege to appoint friends in high places to the board to rubber stamp gubernatorial decisions in regards to higher education in the state.
Muckrakers
Doyle Vetos Regent Bill, Vindicates Politics as Usual
Bipartisain efforts to have seven geographically diverse citizen regents vetoed by governor.
By Jerad McHenry
Tuesday, December 29, 2009 7:49 p.m.
Updated Tuesday, December 29, 2009 7:52:17 p.m.
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Related stories:
- Doyle meets with Obama -- possible cabinet position? (November 14, 2008)
- If Anybody Else Had Said This... (August 28, 2008)
- Did Doyle break the law? (September 3, 2008)
- The giants sitting outside the Gov's race (October 4, 2009)
- ASM Constitution Debate - live blog (February 18, 2009)
Also by Jerad McHenry:
- Power Drunk Polities Pack Proverbial Punches At Establishments Serving More than Punch (March 3, 2010)
- Scalping and the Scaming Away of Constitutional Rights (March 3, 2010)
- Doyle's New Health Mandate Means More Money Required for Health Premiums (March 3, 2010)
- Sugary Drinks May Be Fattening, But Millions to Prove It: Fiscally Unsavory (January 12, 2010)
- Conspicuous Lack of W-2 Enrollment Validates Wisconsin Welfare Reform in the First Place (January 12, 2010)


Leave a comment