News
Animal rights debate rages
BRYAN FAUST/Herald Photo
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Emily Clark:
- Star Trek actor pushes equality (April 19, 2006)
- Hundreds pack lecture hall for College Democrats kick-off (September 14, 2006)
- Veterans Museum hosts war speaker (October 6, 2006)
- Pulitzer Prize winner to contribute experiences (November 1, 2006)
- State archives go digital (February 20, 2006)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
For the first time in eight years, a debate concerning the use of animals in research was held Thursday on the University of Wisconsin campus.
Eric Sandgren, chair of the All Campus Animal Care and Use Committee, agreed to go head-to-head in a debate with Rick Bogle of the Alliance for Animals' Primate Freedom Project on issues concerning animal use in UW research.
The crux of the debate on animal use in research Thursday centered on whether the same rights persist for animals as for humans.
Sandgren defended his stance, saying he does not believe animals have the same rights as humans, which makes them appropriate test subjects. He added that limits are put on primate centers to ensure the appropriate type of animal is being used and in moderation.
However, Bogle viewed these efforts as unacceptable, stating that all primate centers across the country should be shut down.
"We have been seduced by promises for too long that have not been fulfilled," Bogle said. "We need to put our money into clinical research that looks at human disease and not some made-up mouse disease."
Bogle set his sights on defending animal rights, specifically rights for monkeys. He claimed that research done on animals is irrelevant to the medical advancements concerning human diseases.
Following incidents of harassment from animal-rights activists, Sandgren said he decided to speak out on behalf of researchers.
In addition, Sandgren countered Bogle's argument, saying animal research is crucial for providing effective medical care for humans, especially with regard to drug development.
"There is an undeniable difference between animals and humans, but the benefit of animal testing arises when we are able to eliminate 90 percent of the drugs because we know they will not work in humans by using them in animals first," Sandgren said.
But Bogle said he strongly believes that although animals may be unable to communicate their pain and emotions, they still experience feelings and interact with one another much like humans do.
Sandgren recognized there was a polarization on both sides of the debate and that both have valid arguments, adding that small steps are being made to reduce the amount of animals used in research along with the exploration of alternative methods.
Though other options are being considered, Sandgren said he believes a complete abolishment of animal use in research is impossible because animal use is a necessity in medical advancements.
However, Bogle refused to recognize these advancements and said not enough is being done.
Mediated by Deborah Blum, a UW journalism professor and science writer, the audience was invited to ask questions concerning the issues brought up by Sandgren and Bogle.
UW sophomore Katie Keller, who attended Thursday's debate, said she believed Sandgren did not address his side of the debate as specifically as Bogle.
"[I]t was an incredibly interesting debate that surprisingly made me question my own beliefs," Keller said.
Sandgren told the audience attending the debate that the importance of the issue is undeniable, and by providing transparency to both sides of the debate, the public can make its own educated decision on where it stands.
Bogle expressed similar thoughts on the issue's importance.
"I think that things can change, and I think things aren't changing," Bogle said. "Not many people are educated on this issue, and, therefore, the public has no idea what's going on. I believe in education."
8 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Education is the key. And from Rick Bogel’s statements, he is not educated.
There just animals, I don’t see the problem with using them to help our knowledge of medical probelms. These damn animal rights people need to get real professions and stop wasting time on animals.
The first two posters need to go back to school themselves. The first couldn’t even type “Bogle” correctly even though it’s right there at the top of the screen.
The second misued “There” (should be they’re.) Remove that plank from your own eye before pointing out the speck in others.
As soon as Bogle volunteers as a test subject I’ll consider his demands.
I like my place on the food chain (so to speak). If wants to take a step down he should feel free, just as long as he doesn’t try to drag me with him.
I am grateful that people like Rick Bogle have the courage to question the use of outdated experiments on innocent animals who have no recourse against such abuses. As the more intelligent species I think that we should be evolving to the point that abuse of any sentient being is unacceptable. Many experiments done on animals have proven unreliable. With current technology there are sophisticated tests without the use of animals that are proving to be more successful. Isn’t it time we let go of out moded experiments and let the animals we share this planet with live their lives the way they were meant to?
coldhearted and ignoarant is what that is.
i think it is cruel and intimidating rock on Boggle1
good job