The University of Wisconsin announced Thursday it reached a settlement with the UW Roman Catholic Foundation over a discrimination lawsuit filed in November over the group's funding.
The claim alleged UWRCF did not receive fair and viewpoint-neutral treatment when it was denied eligibility by the Student Services Finance Committee.
Under the terms of the settlement, Chancellor John Wiley agreed to finally approve $253,274 in student-segregated fee funding for the group as part of a budget to be forwarded to the UW System Board of Regents this summer.
In addition to dropping its case with the U.S. Department of Justice, UWRCF agreed to make a structural change within its organization by cutting ties from St. Paul's University Catholic Parish and not seeking funding for any religious services, such as weddings.
David French, attorney for UWRCF and senior council for Alliance Defense Fund in Tennessee, said the settlement contained two "enduring virtues" in its fairness and sustainability over time.
"The Roman Catholic Foundation is enjoying equal rights with every other group on campus, regardless of its religious viewpoints," French said. "It also creates a framework for settling these issues in the future."
French added the split from St. Paul's would clear up a great amount of confusion with funding decisions.
Casey Nagy, Wiley's chief of staff, said the settlement would help both parties in the future.
"We're happy that all the issues were resolved in a way that we'll be able to move forward in a really positive way, and that's to everybody's benefit," Nagy said. "They worked very hard on language that would help guide decision-making on possible points of tension in the future."
UWRCF spokesperson Tim Kruse said the group had hoped to separate the student organization from St. Paul's for some time but were required to wait until pending legal actions were complete.
"The chapel is now run by a separate foundation — there's no reason it has to be that way but it complicated things for a lot of reasons," Kruse said. "Now it's separate, and is a nice clean break from our other religious activities with a priest and other sacramental actions."
When asked about future legal actions against UW, French said he hopes this was the last suit and is confident in the organization's bylaw changes last month, which appeased a federal district court judge by installing a student-run board of directors.
Kruse, however, said he will continue to fight for full-time staff funding — which he says other student organizations on campus are funded for — in addition to off-campus rent, which will be addressed at a Board of Regents meeting this summer.
Now that the discrimination case has been dropped, Nagy said he is satisfied with the constructive changes that have been made.
"In general, you always try to resolve disputes through discussion, and sometimes discussion doesn't work," Nagy said. "In this case, we had the opportunity to have other discussions within a legal decision — it's a positive outcome."




IP hash: f8cc29f2
I fancy funding forced-faith foundations! Fabulous!
—Damien C. Bordeaux
IP hash: c1c314ee
I hate it when people discriminate. By the way we should cut funding to LGBTCC and give it to the Catholics or may be vise versa. If only we could have a system where people could choose to put their own money into groups they support…oh yes I forgot SSFC and ASM Finance committee know better than me. - Germain E. Stemme
IP hash: d587d33a
The viewpoint neutrality clause castrats ASM and SSFC. I mean a quarter million dollars a year? The UWRCF obviously isn’t worth that to UW students, but they are willing to fight tooth and nail to get paid.
UWRCF should be ashamed of their greed, and ASM should be ashamed of its broken system.
IP hash: ebb7e1af
Viewpoint neutrality castrates ASM and SFFC only if they seek to violate the Constitution by hand picking which speech they find acceptable in a public forum. To Hell with free speech! Let’s just let SFFC tell us what speech we should value in society!
You can argue that only the Roman Catholic segment of the UW population benefits from the RCF, but in that case I didn’t benefit at all from the Multicultural Student Coalition (whose budget is MUCH higher than the Catholics’ budget). The point of the seg fee system isn’t that every student benefit from every student organization. The system is in place to make it possible for a diverse range of student orgs to exist, thus enriching the campus community.
Steve Karlen
IP hash: 0fede5da
surprised no one asked how much they settled for…$$$ the UWRCF is getting a huge chunch of change for this one, and I know this for a fact.
IP hash: fa0f759f
ALL campus groups are entitled to the same rights, and that includes religious. What a bunch of hypocrites you posters are.