News

Candidates clash over ASM laptop

Political intrigue spices up elections after allegations of group misusing resources

A complaint filed against the For Accessibility Community and Empowerment of Students slate by current members of the Associated Students of Madison was dropped by the Student Judiciary Committee Saturday, allowing all FACES members to remain on the ballot for today’s student government election.

The complaint, filed by Student Services Finance Committee Chair Carl Fergus and SSFC Representative Tyler Junger, accused Kyle Szarzynski — a current member of ASM who is on the FACES slate — of violating a campaigning rule stating no ASM equipment can be used for campaigning.

According to Junger, the computer history of one of the ASM laptops showed a member of the FACES campaign had uploaded a flyer to publicize one of the slate’s fundraisers.

Since the flyer would publicize for a fundraiser to raise money for the entire slate, Junger and Fergus proposed every member of the slate be removed from the ballot.

“The entire slate benefits from the entire fundraiser giving them an unfair advantage,” Junger said. “It’s a violation of election rules. … The slate should be removed from the ballot.”

Though Junger and Fergus acknowledged they were not certain Szarzynski was responsible for using the computer, they added that Szarzynski is the only other person other than themselves with keys to the ASM office.

A post on the “forward thinking” FACES website, which Junger and Fergus say can only be accessed by Szarzynski, during the same session the flyer was uploaded led them to make this accusation.

Szarzynski, who is also a Badger Herald columnist, acknowledged having the computer in his possession during the time the flyer was uploaded, though denied doing it himself.

Szarzynski refused to say who did the uploading.

“The important thing is the flyer was not constructed on the laptop. It was downloaded from an e-mail and that is why the file shows up in brackets on the computer,” Szarzynski said.

Szarzynski added the complaint was dropped because Junger and Fergus had no tangible evidence the flyer was used to promote the fundraising event.

“It was just a rough draft and that’s why the individuals who filed the complaint couldn’t find a copy, that’s why it’s frivolous because no actual copy of that flyer was ever used to promote the fundraising event,” Szarzynski said.

Szarzynski added that although the case was dropped, he suspected some political motivations were behind the complaint.

“Considering Tyler Junger is running, advocating that half the L&S candidates be removed clears the way for his own election, so I think [the Student Judiciary Committee] realized it’s a conflict of interest, so they decided to drop it,” Szarzynski said.

Junger denied these claims, saying he simply encouraged enforcement of ASM rules.

Junger also said though he will happily face his opponents in today’s election, he does not agree with many of their ideologies.

“I think having a difference is a good thing, but it should stay within the confines of the rule,” Junger said.

The Associated Students of Madison elections will take place Monday to Wednesday of this week electronically at www.asm.wisc.edu.

5 Comments | Leave a comment

user-pic

To clarify, SJ did not drop the case. Tyler and I decided to drop the case as we do not have clear and convincing evidence that the flyer was actually used in advertising for the event. We are however keeping better tabs on the SSFC computer.

-Carl

user-pic

I understand the need to create “spice” in this election to increase readership, but doing so when none exists is transparentally problematic.

The complaint was frivolous, which is why Tyler and Carl decided to drop it within hours of filing it. The Student Judiciary didn’t even have to go through the routine of summarily dismissing it since those who filed it were the ones who withdrew it.

I brought one of the SSFC computers down to the Student Tenant Union office last week for use doing counseling hours. I then left and a different employee of the STU, also on the FACES slate, used the computer to download a flyer, unaware that it was an ASM computer. (For obvious reasons, I am not releasing this person’s name). And like it states in the article, that particular flyer was never used so no “benefit” was brought to the slate. In other words, no ASM law was broken.

Considering that Tyler himself withdrew the complaint, I’m not sure why this article was even printed. It had no merit and was never even brought to a hearing. After I explained what happened via email, he emailed the FACES candidates named in the suit, as well as the SJ Chief Justice, apologizing for the error. Both Tyler and Carl also both personally apologized to me.

If anyone has any other questions about this non-story, please feel free to email me at [email protected]

user-pic

Kyle’s recollection of the story is accurate. After finding the file on the SSFC computer after last Monday’s meeting, Carl and I filed suit without realizing that that the flier had never been printed, nor had it been created on the SSFC computer. We decided to drop the complaint following this revelation, fully realizing that trying to argue that simply accessing a file is giving a boon to an entire slate of candidates is just unfair.

ASM needs the active participation of students in order to better serve the UW community. The more people we have running for office, the better. With more candidates and organized slates, it’s important that everyone play by the same set of rules. We believe that, in this case, everyone has.

user-pic

Nothing like a SJ case to get this election season going. I’m still having a hard time understanding when these elections got so politically charged and what benefit the campus receives from partisanship.

user-pic

Hah. NON STORY! Reeeaaaccchiiing. Give it up. ASM is not exciting.

Leave a comment

To comment anonymously or if signed in, leave name and e-mail blank.

Donate