News: Top story

Victim seeking millions from frat

UW student allegedly raped in 2008 suing for $10M in punitive damages
Victim seeking millions from frat

KARI FISCHER/Herald file photo

The Sigma Chi fraternity house, 221 Langdon St., is the alleged location of a sexual assault last October.

The student suing the University of Wisconsin Sigma Chi fraternity, national headquarters and insurers for an alleged rape in the fall of 2008 is seeking more than $10 million in damages, according to documents filed recently in the Milwaukee County Circuit Court.

The plaintiff, a Milwaukee woman identified as “Jane Doe,” filed the civil suit last July. The suit seeks damages for injuries sustained after she was allegedly drugged and raped multiple times at the Sigma Chi house the night of Oct. 4 or in the early morning of Oct. 5, 2008.

Filed in late March, the document says the woman is claiming $2,321.47 to pay for medical bills and $10 million to cover past and future physical and emotional injuries.

The document also contains a list of witnesses who, unless a pending motion to dismiss the case is approved later this year, could be called to testify when trial proceedings begin in 2011. Witnesses include medical experts, UW students, members of Chancellor Biddy Martin’s office, Interfraternity Council and Panhellenic Association, and at least one member of Sigma Chi, among others.

In support of potential testimonies by medical officials, other documents detail physical and emotional pain sustained by the plaintiff. Meriter Hospital records detail tests and treatments administered Oct. 5, including a sexual assault nurse exam.

The records indicate serious damage was found during a pelvic exam and the student also sustained injuries to her right foot and face.

Another document, submitted by psychologist Marc Ackerman, includes findings from a psychological examination completed in May 2009. In the document, Ackerman says the student had been suffering academically, socially and emotionally since the rape. Tests suggested she may have been suffering from major depressive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder and somatization disorder.

However, the defendants are currently seeking to dismiss the case, with one motion filed March 15 stating the plaintiff’s failure to disclose an insurer or other party that paid for medical care limits the defendants’ abilities to collect information and creates other problems for the judicial process.

However, the plaintiff could file an updated complaint to address these concerns, as was done in an amended complaint after the defendants filed a motion objecting to the plaintiff’s charge that the fraternity’s owners violated Wisconsin safe place statutes by not providing a safe space for guests.

The plaintiff filed a second amended complaint in early March that makes another series of changes to the suit. The original complaint provides examples of a variety of incidents at other Sigma Chi chapters, including several instances of sexual assault.

The latest complaint still names other chapters, but focuses more clearly on alleging the defendants should have specifically made a greater effort to protect female visitors from sexual abuse and other violations of chapter, city and state laws due to knowledge of past incidents at other chapter houses.

It also adds it was previously known there were practices of alcohol abuse at Sigma Chi, putting guests at risk.

As in the first two complaints, the defendants denied the plaintiff’s charges, demanding a dismissal of the second amended complaint.

Both parties are also undergoing collection of information for the suit. Among the items plaintiff attorney Robert Elliott of Milwaukee wants the defendants to release is a document produced by Sigma Chi headquarters titled “The Ritual.” Elliott believes a potentially similar document he obtained via the Internet indicates the national headquarters exercise extreme control over individual chapters.

The amount of control headquarters exerts over the UW chapter has emerged as a major issue in the suit, though headquarters has consistently denied any serious control of or responsibility for actions within individual houses.

“However, even a cursory reading of ‘The Ritual’ demonstrates that the [national headquarters] exercises rigid control over its chapters…,” Elliott said in an affidavit filed March 10.

Sigma Chi attorney Marie Stanton said the defendants will file a reply by Friday.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company was dismissed as a defendant Monday after a Milwaukee judge agreed their insurance policies covering Sigma Chi do not apply to the suit. Milwaukee attorney James Murray said another defendant, Lloyd’s of London, would most likely cover the fraternity.

The student and Elliott have previously stated they will not speak to the media concerning the suit.

A scheduling order filed in December names Nov. 1 as the deadline for the completion of information collection, excluding out of court testimonies.

A final pretrial conference will be held April 1, 2011, when a trial date, if required, will be scheduled. The defendants and plaintiff have demanded trial by a 12-person jury.

24 Comments | Leave a comment

user-pic

“future emotional and physical injuries” are not punitive damages. Ultimately, future injuries/emotional injuries are a lot harder to pin down so the actual amount will be very jury sensitive.

That said, it seems like “Jane Doe” is only seeking compensation for her injuries.

user-pic

Remember when everybody said this didn’t happen because the Herald didn’t go find medical records? Haha. Better late than never, I was skeptical before but now totally believe it. Gonna be a hell of a trial.

user-pic

in other words, “I’m asking for 10 mil but I’ll settle for 10k?”?

user-pic

This is completely ridiculous, 10 Million? Im a dude and I would let this whole thing happen to me in a second, no hesitation, for 10 Million. This girl is lucky if she gets 10 Million, and more girls are going to try to take after her to get that cash.

user-pic

sounds a lot like the duke lacrosse situation

user-pic

aka…a girl looking for money from organizations with lots of it…so sick of people like that

user-pic

I hate people like that, too. Almost as much as I hate frat boy rapists. I mean it’s close, but…

user-pic

give it up already…

user-pic

Maybe they can hold a chili cook off fundraiser for the money.

user-pic

ha!

user-pic

This will not likely survive a summary judgement motion. At some point she is going to need some more concrete facts. Perhaps she will obtain them, but it seems unlikely given the lack of any at this point. Not only does she need to prove she was raped, she needs to prove who did it, or at the very least that Sigma Chi was responsible for it. You can’t (except in rare instances) say “this is what I think happened, prove it didn’t happen.”

user-pic

by surviving dismissal jane doe has access to discovery. if something turns up in discovery, the frat may be in trouble. If something doesn’t turn up she will settle out of court.

user-pic

they’re in discovery right now.

user-pic

“The records indicate serious damage was found during a pelvic exam and the student also sustained injuries to her right foot and face.” ….. Sounds like an attempt at the splits gone bad at a bar.

user-pic

a copy of the ritual that he got online…i remember a piece in time magazine a few years back that had the sigma chi ritual as one of the top 3 biggest secrets in america next to the coca cola recipe… good luck getting a copy “online”

also, BH, please stop with the frat front page slander articles

user-pic

I’m curious if you know what “slander” means. When a student or former student brings a multi-million dollar suit to a frat at the university, I’m pretty sure that’s front-page news.

I’m never quick to defend the BH, but you’re being silly. It would be irresponsible for them to not cover the story.

Pick out some slander statements for us?

user-pic

how is this slandering the frat? its just saying what jane doe is doing. get over yourself frat boy.

user-pic

first off, the sigma chi-time magazine article is a myth/urban legend.

what is true is that the largest international fraternities (i.e. Sigma Chi, Lambda Chi Alpha, SAE, Beta Theta Pi, TKE) release several false ritual books online which are completely bogus. go ahead and google “how high does the eagle fly” classic example of a large fraternity spreading false rituals

user-pic

Just wondering why the same girl writes EVERY article on the greek system in the BH….

user-pic

it’s called having a beat writer. but i’m sure you think it’s just some part of vast herald conspiracy to bring down the greeks.

user-pic

I really hate that there is even doubt that she was raped. the report is available. It was even printed in an earlier article. The examining nurse said that it had been one of the most violent rapes she had seen in a long time, and most likely by more than one person. I mean c’mon, are you really going to say it’s consensual to get your face beaten? and they have DNA evidence why are the frat boys not eager to exonerate themselves if they’re all so innocent? Yes..I know SOME of them did come forward and willingly donate DNA but not all and I find a hard time understanding why they wouldn’t.

user-pic

DNA testing is very expensive and proving yourself not-guilty, for something you know you didn’t do, is time consuming. Wasting time and money are reasons they might not have been tested. Just thoughts.

user-pic

first of all, specific facts from the case that are for or against jane doe will never be released to the public until after the case is closed. why would either side of the case want to give away the cards they are holding, so to speak. also, police and other officials involved in the case are not allowed to talk about the case in detail to the press until the case is closed…again, this explains why no specific details are given in any of the badger herald articles.

what makes me the most disgusted, is NOT the fact that the VICTIM is suing for 10 million dollars, but the fact that people at this school have the audacity to discredit a rape victim. a RAPE victim. everyone has a mother, a sister, a girlfriend, a friend, an acquaintance…would you discredit that person if they came forward and said they were sexually assaulted? maybe because someones sister was dressed “slutty” one night, she deserved it, right?

the frat system is NOT who we should be blaming either. it is the culture on this campus and its inability to provide support for a fellow student who was brutally attacked. i am in a sorority and i cant believe the amount of GIRLS that discredit the victim of this attack. find some morals and give the victim the benefit of the doubt. there ARE people named in this case, and THOSE people will suffer the consequences. rape is not okay. why should this be any different than if a girl had been attacked by a fellow freshmen in her dorm room?

user-pic

why are we still referring to this girl as jane doe? everyone knows the girls name by now…the entire case is a huge joke and a waste of time, give it up already

Leave a comment

To comment anonymously or if signed in, leave name and e-mail blank.

Donate