Opinion

Advice for UW’s advising

Before every student government meeting, we share our two cents. When the administration speaks, we reply. And when the city cracks down on drinking, we object. All in all, we like to think that we’re full of good advice.

Unfortunately, the administration is not.

As every Letters and Science undergrad knows all to well, L&S academic advising is a joke. Intra-departmental advisors are horribly overworked, while inter-departmental advisors are generally unhelpful or uninformed. Too many seniors come back for a fifth year to fill long-forgotten requirements, while too many freshmen enroll in classes they don’t need.

This afternoon, the Associated Students of Madison will launch a campaign to urge Chancellor Wiley to invest in Cross College Advising and Letters and Science Advising. Specifically, ASM wants the chancellor to use undesignated funds to hire more student peer advisors. The additional peer advisors could immediately start steering freshmen and sophomores towards their breadth requirements, while warning incoming freshmen of the evils of class before 11:00 a.m.

This is not the first time ASM has taken the lead on UW advising. Last semester, ASM successfully lobbied the registrar’s office to allow undeclared students to request major-specific DARS reports. With our support, their campaign was a success: The much-needed service will be available before Thanksgiving.

We also hope the shortage of professional advisors will be better addressed in the next budgetary cycle. While peer advisors will benefit undecided underclassmen, declared undergrads in most L&S departments require professional advice from overworked departmental advisors. But for now, especially in light of this year’s record freshman class, Chancellor Wiley should invest every spare nickel in L&S advising.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Donate