Opinion

Still waiting

State Senate Majority Leader Chuck Chvala may be the UW System’s best friend in the coming weeks. After the Assembly finishes its catfight with the Board of Regents it will be up to the Senate to protect the quality of a UW education. Unfortunately the state of the UW System is not a complete priority for Sen. Chvala.

We have twice editorialized this year about the status of four regents — Gerard Randall Jr., James R. Klauser, Phyllis Krutsch and Lolita Schneiders — who have been appointed to the board by the governor, some of them 22 months ago. None of the four have been voted on for confirmation by the Senate.

As majority leader, Chvala decides what gets voted on and when. It seems clear he is avoiding these votes in the hopes a Democrat will be elected governor in November and replace all four. In short, Chvala is playing politics with the board — a move decidedly not in UW’s best interest, as this weekend has demonstrated.

Another issue is at stake. As the Board of Regents is dealing with cuts of millions of dollars initiated by the governor, these four are serving at his pleasure. The chilling effect on any criticism or alternative ideas held by these regents is obvious.

If the UW is a priority for Sen. Chvala, he should allow a vote on these regents immediately. Randall, approved a week ago by the Senate committee on education, would be a good regent to start with. His most recent appointment is his second, he is the vice-president of the board, and is in line to be the first African-American president of the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents has enough problems. Chvala should stop adding more for purely political purposes.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Donate