I support fairness for all people. I oppose the proposed amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution that would ban civil unions and marriage for gay and lesbian couples.
In March 2004, the Wisconsin Legislature began the process of writing an unfair amendment into our state constitution. It reads, “only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state.” This amendment not only bans marriage for same-sex couples, but also prohibits civil unions and domestic partnerships. This amendment goes too far.
It is important to remember that if this amendment passes, it will affect real Wisconsin families. Currently, gay and lesbian couples are struggling to protect and sustain their families without many of the over 1,200 rights and responsibilities provided to married couples under federal and Wisconsin law. These include basic things like being able to visit a loved one in the hospital, sharing health and retirement benefits and taking bereavement leave in the case of a death in the family.
Injustices occur daily, whether it’s the couple who has been together for 29 years and can’t see each other after one is hospitalized with heart problems, or the mother whose daughter has had an allergic reaction to a bee sting and has to race across town to get a note from her partner — the legally recognized mother — to take their child to the hospital. The proposed amendment to our state constitution would permanently enshrine this kind of unequal treatment toward Wisconsin families at some of their most vulnerable moments.
This amendment isn’t just about gay marriage. You don’t need to support gay marriage in order to oppose the amendment. It would also ban any legal status that is “substantially similar” to marriage. This means even civil unions or domestic-partner benefits, which offer many or most of the rights of marriage, would also be banned. It goes too far.
The broad language of this amendment is so vague that it could even threaten the right of employers to offer health insurance to domestic partners of their employees. Right now, over 100 employers in Wisconsin offer such benefits, including American Family Insurance and Kimberly-Clark. Enacting this amendment could mean wasteful legal battles for them and deflated job-recruiting prospects in our state.
Our state constitution was designed to protect people, not to hurt them. Article 1 reads, “all people are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights: among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” This amendment abuses our constitution and attempts to deny to certain people in Wisconsin one of our three recognized essential rights.
Wisconsinites don’t want this. We don’t want our state to legalize unfair, unequal treatment. This amendment isn’t about defining marriage, it’s about preventing gay and lesbian couples and their children from having important legal protections they need to sustain their families. This amendment is wrong for Wisconsin.
Wisconsin citizens have the opportunity to play an active role in the amendment process. The proposed language, which has passed the Legislature once, must pass again this session and then go to a statewide vote. Gov. Doyle has no official role in this process — he cannot veto an amendment. It is important that citizens follow this amendment each step of the way.
Right now we need to contact our local state assembly and state senate representatives and let them know we don’t want inequality to become the law in our state. Call or e-mail your representatives from back home and urge them to vote NO on the constitutional amendment. Talk to your parents, friends, coworkers, and peers about why this amendment goes too far. Then, if this goes to a statewide ballot on April 5, please be sure to get out and vote NO on the amendment. The people in this state have a powerful voice. Let’s use it to guarantee that we’re still upholding fairness and equality as our primary values.
Elizabeth Sanger ([email protected]) is the campus chair of College Democrats.






IP hash: 59c01aeb
Queers should not be allowed to marry, that is sick.
IP hash: ffdf963f
“Queers should not be allowed to marry, that is sick.”
Bigots and idiots shouldn’t be allowed to marry. That just brings down the entire human condition.
IP hash: 97c10822
“Bigots and idiots shouldn’t be allowed to marry. That just brings down the entire human condition.”
Brings down the entire human condition? Well by-golly-gosh, we wouldn’t want to “bring down the entire human condition”, would we? I mean, the last thing we’d ever want to do in the eyes of the world is to “bring down the entire human condition.”
Yeh, and just how many other countries have legalized gay marriage? Is it like we’re the only ones who are banning it? Obviously, it’s not as popular an idea as you’d like us to believe.
IP hash: ffdf963f
“Yeh, and just how many other countries have legalized gay marriage? Is it like we’re the only ones who are banning it? Obviously, it’s not as popular an idea as you’d like us to believe.”
Yeah, ‘cause we really want to be following the lead of such bastions of freedom as China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Cuba.
IP hash: 52689b5b
Liz,
I think you’re spot-on in this editorial. My question is, how do we stop DEMOCRATS from supporting the amendment? Many of them voted for it last time, and that sucks. It’s one thing when crazy right-wing GOP fundies vote for it, but it’s that much worse when they have the complicity of the so-called opposition.
IP hash: c47f2c95
“Yeh, and just how many other countries have legalized gay marriage?”
Countries that have legalized or are legalizing same-sex marriage or domestic partnerships: - Netherlands - Belgium - Sweden - Spain - United Kingdom - Germany - Denmark - France - Norway - Finland - Portugal - Iceland - Canada - Argentina (Buenos Aires state) - New Zealand - Australia
I count 16 other countries, not to mention New Jersey, Vermont and Massachusetts.
IP hash: 7d58a649
Tis true that in my day the Carrying on of Young Lads with their Tutors, Proctors and Roommates at the Colleges of Mother England set many a tongue a twitter. But it was, to many, a purely Private Matter that carried with it Diverse Punishments (the Press Room, Hang’d Til Half Dead, then Drawn and Quartered) if not simply being whispered among the Great Personages of Society as a Sodomite. However, your society has Progress’d in its views, a Laudable Thing Indeed. Today, the Homosexual, either Man or Woman, is a Equal of the Realm, a situation and result I Highly Endorse. To be frank (though I hate those Papist Jacobite bastards so) it not a Good Thing to pass the Marriage Amendment for it seals in to the character of Wisconsin’s Constitution (a Queer document to my eyes, but one I Highly Endorse as well) a questionable moral attribute. Why would the leaders of this state Condemn from On High as if they were the Lord Himself? Only the Weak and Infirm legislate from the Pulpit. Ms. Sanger, you are as the Lads and Lasses say These Days, Right On. The Rights of Man are Equal, no matter who you may prefer to carouse with when amorous nights sweep away your tender sensibilities. Those who object are Ignorant, Phobic, and Narrow-Minded. Their Wrongness will be exposed when they end up on the side of history tthe same as the Racists who ran my country and yours for so many years. I fought Slavery for it was Evil Institution. The Homophobic Agenda is no different.