Madison's smoking ban has taken effect and lungs all over the city are breathing a sigh of relief. There are many compelling reasons to forbid smoking in public places. In fact, cities such as Wausau and Oshkosh have also passed smoking bans and Appleton is following suit with a ban of their own. Bar and restaurant workers — as well as patrons — who have consistently been at risk for health problems have reason to be excited.
There is a downside to this particular ban, however. Business is hurting in Madison. Bar owners are begging the city council to change their position. As was demonstrated Sept. 20 at the City Council debate, the aldermen seem almost completely disinterested in hearing their complaints as their businesses lose money and they are forced to move out of Madison. This is not the way to ban smoking in public places in Madison. Small businesses have a hard enough time starting up and succeeding in today's economy. They should not have to deal with their customers going to establishments down the street in Middleton to be able to have a smoke with their drink. Cigar bars in Madison such as Maduro have been having a specifically hard time with the ban considering it has been made impossible to obtain an exemption.
Don't get me wrong; I'm all for a smoke-free Wisconsin. Public health issues need to be considered carefully alongside and weighed against the economic consequences at stake. As hokey as it sounds, second-hand smoke kills. The research has shown conclusively that sucking down tobacco, nicotine and tar is not only harmful to you, but everyone around you as well. Children in restaurants and innocent non-smoking bystanders at bars should not have to suffer the dangers of the poison sticks known as cigarettes.
Smoking bans can be and have been successful in other parts of the country. My home state of California currently has a working and fair smoking ban. It is enjoyable to walk into restaurants and bars all over the state. Businesses are not rebelling and attempting to override the ban as they are here. Owners are not being forced to lay off workers and cigar bars do not have such a hard time getting exemptions to help their business stay afloat. The reason it has worked so well is that it covers the entire state. It is simply unfair to have a citywide smoking ban and not a statewide ban. If a smoker can go a few minutes out of his way to smoke, local businesses will lose customers left and right as has been the case in Madison.
Madison does not need more negative press concerning business right now. Major attractions that have lured business and tourists such as Kites on Ice and the Blues Fest are gone, the City Council is being blamed for numerous anti-business moves and Madison is looking less accommodating to business than ever.
Madison is an incredible city. With this smoking ban however, the city is creating a persona for itself that will hurt us all in the long run. Businesses will be afraid to set up shop here and our local economy will suffer. All the new facelifts around town will have been in vain and Madison will no longer be one of the greatest places to live in the country. What Wisconsin needs is a statewide smoking ban; one that will benefit the health and well-being of all the citizens of the state without punishing businesses for being located in certain cities. This would be the only fair way to take the health of the state as well as the health of the economy into consideration.
Julie Isen ([email protected]) is a senior majoring in political science.





IP hash: fd36fa3e
So the bars in Madison are more important than the blue collar bars in the small towns in Wisconsin? Check the economic info in NY and MA. The bars in NYC and Boston are doing fine, but how about the ones in Buffalo? In the country out in Mass? Suffering greatly. Maduro definitely should have a cigar bar exemption; that needs to be fixed legislatively. But a statewide smoking ban is essentially giving the finger to anyone who owns a bar in a small town. And lets not say that this is actually a health issue for any of you, especially all of you 18 to 22 year old college kids. It’s a personal comfort issue that you mask as a health issue.
IP hash: acbf0623
Damn straight. I agree totally, but I’m not sure how John Gard and his constituants (which is wierd because he represents portage but has a house in sun prarie…) in the “Deep North” would repond to a sound public health initiave.
IP hash: 01d013ed
Do you remember in your history class talking about Prohibition? That didn’t work out that well did it? You’ll probably argue that smoking and drinking aren't the same thing. But would you rather inhale some second hand smoke or be walking along the sidewalk and be hit by a drunk driver leaving you paralyzed or dead? Instead of banning smoking in whole, why not give tax incentives to places willing to go smoke free? You might also argue that nonsmoking employees should be put in danger. I say why not? If a prospective employee knows that an establishment allows smoking and they choose to take the risk of getting cancer from secondhand smoke is that any different then a prospective police officer choosing to accept the possibility of being shot?
I’m an ex-smoker that can stand the smell of smoke, but we need to be very careful about creating laws for social engineering, it’s a very slippery slope that I for one don’t wish to slide down.
Isn’t that what the Mayor and the Dean of Students is doing about Halloween on State Street?
IP hash: f8c509c8
Man, that was a horrible article.
IP hash: 61d3393e
Um, no.
Today’s Herald Opinion page is a good candidate for the final nail in the coffin. The Badger Herald has utterly abandoned its roots.
Can you get much more left/irrelevant than this ensemble? There’s a piece praising “diversity,” an argument for a statewide smoking ban, some truly sophomoric babble against Bush and Iraq that says absolutely nothing new, and a useless piece on scooters. How pathetic.
Cristina Daglas sold the Herald down river last year. And it’s now quite apparent that it’s never going to leave the Delta.
IP hash: 5ecb794e
Wait a minute….
Business is hurting in Madison, because of the smoking ban. Madison is getting a bit of a bruise in its public image because of the ban, and the government that instilled is looking bad.
So instead, we create a ban that does all that on a state-wide scale.
I WAS in favor of the city-wide ban since I (a non-smoker) could now breathe in city bars. I’m still in favor of it if they’ll either get public approval (referendum) or allow cigar bar etc. exemptions. However, the logic of this article, as posed, is simply ludicrous.
Analogy: Flooding is destroying neighborhoods, culture, and families in the Mississippi Delta. Let’s put the whole state of Louisiana underwater! At least we’ll be able to get rid of all the unhealthy condemned buildings!
-WN
IP hash: 5e1f675b
This is stupid. Maybe ban smoking in restaurants and such, where you’re only spending 30 minutes to an hour at most, but people stay at bars for at least a few hours.
It is not yours, nor the government’s right to decide the rules of somebody’s business. cough communism. It’s a bar. Smoking and bars have gone hand in hand for decades.
“Oh, well I just got hit by a drunk driver and paralyzed, but hey, at least I didn’t inhale any second hand smoke tonight!”
Morons.