Opinion

Abstinence only education fails students

Abstinence is the safest and most effective way to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STIs. We all know that. However, do you know what a condom is? Are you aware that condoms can prevent pregnancy and STIs as well, but are not 100 percent effective? Yes, you probably do know that. Where did you learn that information? Did your high school or middle school give you the correct information regarding contraception?

Next week, the Assembly Committee on Education will take up two conflicting bills relating to sex education in schools at a public hearing. One bill stresses the importance of comprehensive sex ed that includes abstinence, methods of contraception, pregnancy, responsibilities of men and women in sexual relationships and sexually transmitted infections. The other bill defines sex ed in the state of Wisconsin as abstinence-only education.

One of the main problems with abstinence-only education is the misinformation that it gives students. Unfortunately, abstinence-only education has turned into let-me-tell-you-about-the-evils-of-sex-because-I'm-your-teacher-education. When the students who receive this education decide to have sex, they use condoms at a lower rate than students who receive comprehensive sex ed.

Students should not be misled into believing myths that have become commonplace in abstinence-only classrooms. Allow me to clear a couple things up for you: no, masturbation will not make you go blind and correct use of contraception is important to be aware of if you decide to have sex. Instruction on human growth and development is not a soapbox to preach a teacher's moral values to students; it is an opportunity to prepare children for what they might experience in their futures.

In a perfect world, parents would tell their children everything they need to know and there would be an open forum for discussions about sex and all other topics in every home. Not every home can be like this, though, and teen pregnancy is a major problem in this country. It is especially a problem in Milwaukee, where the African-American teen pregnancy rate is the highest in the country. The dropout rate of pregnant teens is incredibly high, and children of teen mothers have low birth weights and are more likely to repeat the mistakes of their parents. Unless students receive comprehensive and correct information about sex, this cycle won't have a chance to stop.

According to a Columbia University study, teens who take a virginity pledge may be less likely to have premarital sex, but the ones who do are much less likely to use contraceptives. This is a dangerous path to go down that can lead to more unwanted pregnancies. Proper instruction on pregnancy and STIs can save lives. HIV, AIDS, chlamydia and other STIs are serious problems all over the world, and condoms are a good way to prevent them. Abstinence being the number one way of course, but more than half of teens age 15-19 have had sex. It's time to face reality.

Abstinence-only education is dangerous for the youth of today. After the push it received from President Bush's funding ultimatum, it has become a more popular curriculum for some schools. If parents object to accurate information being given to their children on matters of public health, they should have the right to send their kids to a different class for abstinence-only instruction. However, most parents feel comprehensive sex ed is important. In fact, 77 percent of Wisconsin voters favored such a curriculum in 2004.

Students deserve complete and accurate information in all topics they study in school. Sex should be no different. Comprehensive sex ed is not a solution to all the problems concerning teen pregnancy and STIs, but it is at least a step in the right direction.

Julie Isen ([email protected]) is a senior majoring in political science.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

4 older comments

user-pic

STI?

user-pic

I think you should do your research a little more before you write something like this. There are experts on abstinence out there and it doesn’t sound like you consulted them at all. It’s very one sided. While I realize this is an editorial, it is always good to make sure you have all the facts before forming an opinion. There’s a group called the Abstinence Clearinghouse that could be of help to you on this topic.

user-pic

Which abstinence facts should she have gotten: the ones that say it doesn’t work, or the ones that say it’s actually increased the incidence of STIs (or STDs, if that’s your vocabulary choice). Because those are the ones backed up by scientific data.

user-pic

What a trite little piece. When is the last time you heard of masturbate and you go blind being taught in an abstinence only program. You conveniently fail to mention HPV the leading cause of cervical cancer and the fact that condoms do not prevent its spread. Condoms are not a good way to prevent pregnancy, the failure rate when accounting for actual use is high

Donate