Opinion

Zero-sum game

In a rare display of fiscal sensibility, the Student Services Finance Committee has decided to drastically trim the pork from the budget presented to them by a student organization.

We applaud them for such a move.

Less than two weeks ago, SSFC voted to minimally fund Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow for the 2006-07 fiscal year. As a result, the organization's budget request of $385,921 was reduced to the minimum amount of around $5,000. CFACT has received segregated fee funding the past three years and currently operates under a budget of $126,435 for the 2005-06 fiscal year.

Like other groups on campus who do not receive substantial segregated fees, CFACT will now have to find other ways next year to finance its hefty salaries, among other expenses, without the benefit of student welfare.

While we are pleased that SSFC has minimally funded CFACT for the next fiscal year, this organization is not the only group deserving of a drastic hack to its budget.

SSFC has concluded their business for the year, and within the next few weeks the Associated Students of Madison must approve all budgets decided by SSFC for the 2006-07 fiscal year. ASM should take it upon itself to continue the precedent SSFC has established by minimally funding all organizations similar in nature to CFACT, including a certain organization that had a budget of $123,209 approved this semester by SSFC. The examples of student groups deserving of a significant reduction in their budgets are not limited to the aforementioned case, but it would be a start.

SSFC's work this year may be over, but that doesn't mean ASM should rubber stamp the budgets approved by SSFC. ASM should critically analyze the budgets approved by the fee distribution organization, and with each vote, ASM should consider the wallets of the students of this university.

It's time the student government on this campus looks to help all students, instead of subsidizing the pockets of a select few.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

1 older comment

user-pic

“minimum amount of around $5,000”?? Wow, I think that says something right there. The MAXIMUM amount a group should receive should be somewhere around $5,000. Groups that want more than that should go out and earn it, rather than stealing it from students via SSFC.

Also, it’s time that ASM sets an overall limit for the amount that can be allocated in one year. There are way too many groups that all serve the same narrow interests. It’s time that the groups are forced to compete against each other, rather than teaming up together to steal from students via SSFC.

Donate