As is evident by recent media coverage of events such as the fall of GM and the New York City transit workers' strike, the American union member often suffers a substantial amount of blame for the nation's economic woes. To varying degrees of directness, the media frequently portrays those individuals who provide the foundation of American industry as simultaneously pervading inefficiency while siphoning profits. When one characterizes the union worker as such, however, they unfairly marginalize an entire community of honest American men and women. Furthermore, though propagandists, perpetuators and propagators of this stereotype would hold otherwise, organized labor's desirable impacts on our nation's economy and society greatly outweigh any negative effects.
Admittedly, unions are no longer as essential to ameliorating the conditions of the American worker as they once were. From this, however, critics often improperly implicate the general ineffectuality of trade unions. The ignorance of detractors is that, presently, the unions function more as a maintenance force in our economy rather than a progressive one.
It is popularly advocated that organized labor increases wages without warrant, only affecting the general workforce insofar as to disseminate idleness and carelessness — a belief which is quite dissonant with the actual significance of unions to the greater American workforce. The earnest wages of today's American worker, for which unions have in the past tirelessly fought, now serve as a standard for all laborers.
As a factor in the American economy of labor, unions precipitate an increase in earnings for union members and non-union members alike, as well as raising employees' consciousness of fundamental issues such as health care and retirement security. Non-union workers are harder to exploit when in the company of union security. Those who defame the repercussions of unions in the marketplace often neglect the immense positive impacts of unions for the overall standard of employee wages and benefits.
Moreover, those opinions with an obsessive concern with the "free market" frequently adopt an ironic perspective on the position of labor unions. Why is it that while they censure the supposed negative impacts of unions in the market, the supporters of free enterprise excuse the malignant, self-serving actions of corporate America as exercising our traditionally liberal notion of freedom?
To this question, one would perhaps retort that the grievance with unions is not severity of economic effect so much as breach of capitalist ideology. To maintain, however, that the political leverage of labor unions is a unique exception in our otherwise perfectly realized system of laissez-faire capitalism is tantamount to fining a homeless man for jaywalking.
Given the comparable degree to which corporate America is subsidized by the United States government, the issue of organized labor illustrates how supporters of the "free market" are, more often than not, simply supporters of corporate America over the welfare of the general populace. Perhaps it is time we exhaust less time reproaching organized labor and more time scrutinizing the myopic motivations of many of our country's largest businesses.
Considering the impacts of labor unions aside from free-market concerns should make readily apparent that unions have other overwhelmingly positive social consequences. Promoting worker solidarity regardless of the frequently exaggerated bureaucracy of organized labor, labor unions in this country are currently perhaps the closest approximation to a politically significant grassroots movement. Unions provide an alternate voice to their members whose political understandings — given their undeniable tendency of being generally less educated — would likely be solely at the mercy of the corporate media.
Though modern labor unions may no longer achieve much of their ends via participation in the free market, through political influence, they nevertheless continue to ensure the acceptability of the condition of the American worker. It is no secret that the same policymakers across the United States who are opposed by unions are those who wish to endow corporate America with greater license to act as it will. Unions impart in their members a fundamental tenet of social responsibility in a representative democracy. Do not be deceived into allying yourself politically with the agenda of the entrenched elites at the expense of general welfare.
Ben Slatky ([email protected]) is a junior majoring in English and philosophy.




IP hash: 33866933
I do love reading economic policy from philosphy and english majors. I’m sorry, but I do think this topic actually does require a little knowledge about econ.
IP hash: 745cf098
Unions are just another private club trying to make as much money as possible for its members. The club officers are really making out like bandits.
IP hash: ca8232d6
People have a constitutional and moral right to band together to protect their own livelihoods from the exploitation of corporations. If we did not have unions here, there would be no minimum wage, there would be no 40 hour work week, there would be no benefits. Children would be working in sweatshops because their parents wouldn’t be making enough money from the coal mines for them to eat. On the plus side, Sam Walton and Donald Trump would be even richer…
IP hash: 745cf098
“Sam Walton”
Rag all you want but Wal-mart is one of the very few big companies where you can rise from cart-pusher to executive.
IP hash: bedd66eb
Teacher’s Unions are the demise of public education in this country. Why not allow kids to goto private schools with money tagged for them if they choose? It only forces schools to get better or get out. This in the end will allow us to rid the country of teachers who are flat terrible, and there are PLENTY, of them.
IP hash: 4f94ba8d
maybe there would be better teachers if salaries were higher, thus creating competition for jobs? right now teachers gain more satisfaction from the joy of teaching than from actual paychecks, and that unfortunately doesn’t mean teachers are skilled.
maybe i should just ignore that unions mean higher wages for hard working people, and just think like everyone else… i wish there was no minimum wage so we could make mexicans work for 50 cents an hour like they do in their own country…