Opinion

“Think, Respect” poorly conceived

Robert Phansalkar’s op-ed on the new “Think Respect” program (Sept. 22) was welcome. It was good to finally see that a student journalist has grasped the fact that the program, as presently conceived, poses a threat to honest discourse and privacy on campus. The program encourages campus citizens to report not only acts of harassment or discrimination that constitute official misconduct, but all forms of “bias,” verbal and non-verbal, without that term being defined in a manner that is consistent with First Amendment principles. In other words, the present policy amounts to a speech code, as it encourages people to file reports on other people’s attitudes and speech that informants deem insufficiently senstive.

Donald A. Downs Professor

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

6 older comments

user-pic

It is nice to see that at least one member of the faculty respects (and protects) our First Amendment rights. Way to go, Downs!

user-pic

What is not nice to see, however, is that a professor, as well, as a columinst for the Badger has confused the aim of the Think Canpaign with the University sanctioned program of confidential reporting and punishment. Are there some affliated with the university that are so terrified of a student initiated program that asks only that one “think”, that they refuse to understand what the program truely requires? Please see www.diversity.wisc.edu/story.php?id=12827 and this time calm down enough to absorb the difference between the student initiative and the that of the administration. Please direct your constitutional argument (the Badger staffer who wrote the original editorial comment should avail himself of this advice as well) to your Chancellor John D. Wiley and Dean of Students Lori Berquam. It is THEIR specific program you have issues with. Direct your complaints there. And again I urge you to think and read well before you condemn the student initiative that simply asks for open mindness and encourages students to think outside their norm.

user-pic

Right on.

user-pic

totally dispectful comments

user-pic

You’re asking students to turn each other in for thoughtcrime.

user-pic

You just got to get your mind right!

Donate