Opinion

No place for race

After tabling the debate in December, the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents is set to again consider a change to its freshman admissions policy at the board’s February meetings.

UW-Madison already uses a “holistic” admissions approach, which considers race, socioeconomic status and community involvement, in addition to GPA, class rank and standardized test scores. This approach would be applied to other UW System schools if the board adopts the new policy.

Several weeks ago, former University of California regent and anti-affirmative action activist Ward Connerly spoke before a special legislative committee formed to investigate affirmative action. Although Mr. Connerly’s visit to Madison was met with much hostility, we appreciate his interest in the UW System and share his view that it is wrong for public universities to use race as a factor in admissions.

While intellectual diversity is certainly a worthwhile goal in an academic environment, using race as a proxy is simply flawed. It is little more than a weak attempt at correcting the deeply rooted racial and educational problems in our state.

And, while we acknowledge that reasonable arguments can be made on both sides of this debate, it was nevertheless unsettling to hear Chancellor John Wiley’s remarks last week to the legislative committee. Wiley claimed that a student has never been denied admission to make room for a less qualified applicant of any race, according to a report by The Associated Press.

The remarks — which are disingenuous at best — seem to be an attempt by the university to have its cake and eat it too. It is exceedingly difficult to believe that, with a finite number of slots available and with race as an explicit consideration, a student has never been denied because of the university’s affirmative action policy.

We would much prefer to see substantive change take place at the elementary through high school levels instead of using race-based admissions policies in college and calling it a panacea. For example, it would be wise to reconsider the current system whereby local property taxes are used to finance local public schools — a system that has left poorly performing Milwaukee public schools, in particular, in a catch-22.

We do applaud the university’s efforts to recruit qualified minority candidates from areas like inner-city Milwaukee and American Indian reservations. However, until race is removed as a factor in the admissions process, these efforts will appear to be little more than recruiting with a wink and a nudge.

With a national holiday commemorating the birth of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. celebrated just days ago, it may be tempting to assume we’ve done away with the racial problems of our not-so-distant past. While this would certainly be a mistake, it is nevertheless crucial that the regents adopt a forward-looking admissions policy that can achieve the intellectual diversity we all desire without resorting to racial preferences.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

3 older comments

user-pic

You don’t want race to count for anything? Neither do I. But unless you’re willing to give up all the unearned advantages you get from being white, race does count. Why not level the playing field a little?

user-pic

I would like to express my discouragement from this article, especially in the wake of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr’s birthday memorial. While MLK is most noted for his message of peace and nonviolence he was also a very keen political mind, who warned of the “white moderate” as the “greatest stumbling block toward freedom.” By this Dr. King refers to one who is “more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can’t agree with your methods of direct action.”” Many people of all shades will claim that while they agree with the Civil Rights Movement they are opposed to the legislation and programs that grew out of the Movement. This is disturbing because it is indicative of the paternalistic attitude that many Americans hold towards people of color. It is similar to the findings of a recent study, which claims that while most young white people acknowledge they experience some level of white privilege in their lives, they do not connect it with the disadvantages faced by people of color. This kind of ignorance is widespread in a society that places monumental emphasis on the individual. To transcend the corrosive individualism that our culture and economy fosters is the greatest responsibility of conscious, thoughtful, and enlightened students and human beings in general. I myself am racially 'white' but I do not oppose an underrepresented race to be amongst several factors that help someone's college admission or job application. This is because I respect history and understand the interconnectedness of all humankind. I challenge you all to do the same. Also, if you claim to support the Civil Rights Movement but oppose affirmative action please provide an alternative policy because there is no question that social, economic and political injustice remains in contemporary American society.

user-pic

I love this editorial.

Donate