On Wednesday, Sept. 19, The Badger Herald ran a guest column regarding the presence of Halliburton at the Engineering Career Services Career Fair. This editorial hit on some important points, chiefly that Halliburton has profited from the Iraq war and the growing trend of tax dollars going toward our military instead of public works, such as education. These are fair points, yet I wonder why it is only now that the Campus Anti-war Network has decided to protest. Halliburton has separated themselves from Kellogg Brown & Root. They have recruited heavily from our school for years and have been to the ECS Career Fair numerous times in the past. Yet it is only now, after Halliburton has ceased their operations in Iraq, that CAN decides it must protest Halliburton. War profiteering is indeed a horrible thing, but why didn’t CAN protest Halliburton while Halliburton was still involved in Iraq? Why this year? Furthermore, Halliburton is a company that contributes greatly to the development of engineering students at the University of Wisconsin. By actively recruiting UW students for their internship and co-op programs, they help to further develop the education of UW engineers by giving them practical work experience. Halliburton donates money toward student projects and design teams — outside of class activities that help to further develop UW engineers during the school year. These are activities that help to develop engineering students by giving them a chance to design products on their own. I have been a part of the Human Powered Vehicle Challenge team for the past two years, which designs and fabricates customized recumbent bicycles as part of a design competition sponsored by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. I have seen firsthand how corporate sponsorship from companies, such as Halliburton, provide a rounded educational experience to UW students. In this regard, Halliburton has contributed greatly to the furthering of the excellence of the UW College of Engineering. In protesting Halliburton, CAN is protesting a company that has provided great amounts of guidance and financial support to UW engineering students. CAN’s protests also have the potential to provide a black mark on the ECS career fair, which is a wonderful event that allows engineering students to talk with company representatives and prepare themselves for the competitive world of job hunting. Should CAN’s protests leave a sour taste in the mouths of career fair participants, the College of Engineering will have lost a wonderful resource for its students. David Mand UW Senior Mechanical Engineering [email protected]
Opinion
Halliburton deserves respect
By Letters to the Editor
Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:00 a.m.
Updated Friday, September 21, 2007 1:33:15 a.m.
Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.
We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Related stories:
- Walking the walk (September 20, 2007)
- Unleash the neutrality (October 11, 2007)
- Free speech a doubled-edged sword (September 21, 2007)
- Welcome back, Mr. Horowitz (October 22, 2007)
- Readers pick yelling, not country, first (October 31, 2008)
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Letter of support from the School of Library and Information Studies (February 25, 2011)
- An open letter to Scott Walker from UW-Madison faculty (February 21, 2011)
- College Republicans dispute ASM e-mail (February 16, 2011)
- Wisconsin Idea corrupted by WID privatization move (December 8, 2010)
- The ethical dilemma of Rose Bowl ticket buyers (December 8, 2010)
17 older comments



IP hash: 76a06c85
So just because Halliburton’s given us money and time, you’re not seeing what’s wrong with your logic?
Yes, it’s a shame that CAN hadn’t protested Halliburton until now, but when was the last time Halliburton was at the career fair?. Yes, it’s also a shame that you’re submitting a resume to a company that is unfortunately STILL PROFITING from the war.
IP hash: 315a8f4a
David, while I appreciate your thoughts, I feel I should enlighten you to my experiences from over twenty years of following Halliburton. Beware of the corporation bearing gifts. Through my friends, and working alongside Halliburton in the oilfields, I feel that they are not only an unethical and immoral corporation, but one which places themselves above the law. Read author Black as to Cheney’s reign selling centrifuges to Iran for the processing of nuclear fuel contrary to US law. Their management practices display their philosophies better than any PR person but to me “robber barons” is the term which springs to my mind. Anything goes, for a buck. Including buying PR through tax deductable donations. If they were as great as they put out in PR, do you really think they would need to lay out money as they do to attract new blood? The only thing which I might hold against CAN is why haven’t they done this before and not just Halliburton? Halliburton is one of a group of companies which operate under the umbrellas of the military/industrial complex and oil for blood. They don’t just operate “with” the government now, they have become the government. Or, don’t they teach an up to date course at UW on this topic?
IP hash: 2a5abc1f
David,
Thank you for voicing this. I think most of us engineers understand that Halliburton is more than just a company that Cheney used to work for, that it isn’t KBR anymore, and that its activities in Iraq are barely the tip of its global operations iceberg. I think most of us also have a problem with our career fair being hijacked and turned into a circus for the political agendas of those whose careers aren’t at risk. I think it’s important for us not to just roll our eyes and tune out the ill-informed masses, but I usually do just that. Sarcasm is easy and it feels good, but it isn’t constructive. I applaud your resolve to issue a respectful, balanced, informed, well-supported response from the engineering perspective.
-Tyler
IP hash: 26f3fd66
” career fair being hijacked and turned into a circus for the political agendas of those whose careers aren’t at risk..”
Yeah right, like those people have careers.
IP hash: 70b34d21
8:14 - Halliburton is at the career fair every year.
IP hash: 95425288
It’s a sad state of affairs when a university have to rely on some greedy corporate giant to float their boat, but face it, Halliburton is a dirty business. Just because they have tons of money doesn’t mean they should be allowed to do whatever they want with impunity.
IP hash: 17e64a3b
“Yeah right, like those people have careers.”
They don’t have careers. They appearantly also don’t have classes. I have to say, they are in ECB right now as I am typing, and while they are being peaceful, they are certainly causing a big scene.
It makes it very hard for the students who are SUPPOSED to benefit from the career to properly connect with employers. This protest is misguided and misplaced. Why punish the Engineering students for Halliburton’s sins?
IP hash: f3fccb31
Just because you hippies can’t get a job with a company like Haliburton doesn’t mean the rest of don’t qualify. Mind you own business and stay away from my future career endeavors.
It’s successful graduates that work for companies like Haliburton that donate to this University, so you hippies can have a place to spout off your ignorant rants and stink up the campus for four years!
IP hash: f3fccb31
Thanks Chancellor Wiley for allowing these losers to embarrass your most intelligent students in front of a successful reputable, American Company, keep this up and our rankings are going to hit rock bottom!
IP hash: f3fccb31
“It’s successful graduates that work for companies like Haliburton that donate to this University, so you hippies can have a place to spout off your ignorant rants and stink up the campus for four years!”
Four years…heck these hippies are here for decades, with professional degrees in whining and crying.
IP hash: b0eb5c26
I appreciate all the thoughts coming back from all different viewpoints.
I think some of the people with comments on the lines of “Halliburton donating doesn’t give them the right to…” are sort of missing the point slightly.
You are all right, of course, that you can’t just excuse something like war profiteering. But that doesn’t change the fact that Halliburton is no longer involved in Iraq. The Air Force, Boeing and Lockheed Martin were among many companies present at the job fair who also had some sort of tie to Iraq. Of all such companies, that I am aware of, Halliburton is the only one who is no longer involved. Yet these companies were not protested: just Halliburton.
How much money does the Air Force contribute to student design groups in Madison? Boeing and Lockheed may have some involvement with a few EMA groups here and there, but does their involvement on campus parallel that of Halliburton? Halliburton gets involved at the UW Women’s Leadership Conference, ASME meetings, NSBE, as well as paying for a brand new lecture hall in (I believe) the Biochem building.
Halliburton’s involvement in Iraq was indeed disgusting, but they are far from the most horrible of the profiteers, and they give back to the academic community. The only thing this protest served to do was disrupt the career fair. I wonder what the protesters feel about how much they disrupted other companies BESIDES Halliburton?
There was a small construction firm at the table right next to Halliburton. While Halliburton can still do a lot of recruiting if their Madison trip goes badly, but what do you think happens to smaller companies who have a bad day at the career fair? Way to step on the little guy, protesters.
IP hash: 7a425e92
I am an engineering student, and I attended the career fair. I also participated in the protest. I’m sorry that you all believe that the protestors don’t have careers or classes or brains. I for one, participated until my class started, as I know other people did too. One of the main organizers for the protest is an upperclassman engineering student. I don’t believe we were “whining” or “crying.” Singing, yes. And we also aren’t hippies. ~K
IP hash: a5a0cfb7
How dare these protesters block the careers of their fellow students !! It’s a shame that the folks who wanted to interview with Haliburton can’t sue these snot nosed punks for future earnings.
IP hash: 31204ad2
35 years ago, chemical engineering students were making identical complaints to the ones above when people were protesting the presence of Dow Chemical, producer of Agent Orange in the Vietnam war, at career fairs.
IP hash: 76a06c85
I am not an engineering student, but I am a science student (yes, I will actually have a job in research that pays well, not a job studying basketweaving, and frankly, I’ve got job prospects that are just as good if not better; still, I’m going into research as a member of a university’s faculty, not a company, because tenure allows much more freedom). I also participated in the protest and went to class the moment I had to go to class.
I fail to understand how we were blocking your careers, either, and nor is Halliburton the most successful company out there. There are companies who are more successful and have a better ethics record.
I wonder if you engineers have heard of the ethics code of the NSPE?
IP hash: b3abee95
“I think most of us also have a problem with our career fair being hijacked and turned into a circus for the political agendas of those whose careers aren’t at risk.”
So you believe that the protesters don’t have careers at risk. Do you have any idea how far the names and faces of the people in charge of the protest have spread already? I trust the term “blacklisted” may ring a few bells. These students are indeed risking their careers for many years to come, while you complain about approximately 90 minutes of singing.
IP hash: 1572cab1
K,
Thanks for the input. While it is certainly unfair to blindly label the protesters as whiny crying brats, it should be noted that the protest only mildly adhered to the rule of keeping relatively quiet and unobrusive. The protest was in fact very distracting and obtrusive. I had to start standing closer to recruiters to hear them better IN THE LOWER LEVEL because of the noise you guys were making. You (the plural you, I mean) sang quietly, but then played bongos, used a loudspeaker, cheered loudly and even started a few chants. It was distracting downstairs, and was even noticable in the computer labs upstairs.
Your loud chant (“Your war, our school”…) as you left was very loud, and clearly an attempt to draw attention to yourselves, as was your march down Johnson, which disrupted traffic.
This was not a peaceful protest, it was a collective cry for attention. The only effect it had on the career fair was to impede students from talking to representatives. Did Howard Immel, Inc.’s representatives appreciate the large mass of protesters setting up right by their table? Did the recruiters on the mezzanine level appreciate that you were blocking the stairs? These are companies who are sending salaried workers to come to Madison for at least a day (often two) to talk to UW students, and your protest meant that perhaps their days could have been better spend at the office. But because Halliburton was there, it was just so important to be inconsiderate of all the other people who put hard work and lots of time into the career fair. All in all, it was very selfish on CAN’s behalf, and the protest hurt small firms and engineering students more than it could ever have hurt Halliburton.
I’ve been sick of our nation’s involvement in Iraq since we first began operations there in 2003. As a senior in high school, I skipped school to attend a peace rally. KBR’s military contracts border on loathesome, but Halliburton has had more than just a positive impact on our school. While seg fees are helping to foot the bill for student orgs such as CAN, companies like Halliburton, Boeing, and Schlumberger are helping to keep engineering design groups alive, preserving our engineering school as one of the nation’s top public programs.
But, perhaps you can help silence me and all the other critics by answering this one simple question: What good did you guys do today? (Please don’t respond with rhetoric)