Opinion

Storm water runoff a serious issue for students

When it rains, it pours, and for a city like Madison with more than four miles of lake shoreline, the question is where to put all the storm water. According to Rhonda James, Senior Landscape Architect for the University of Wisconsin's Facilities Planning and Management, storm water "is always an important issue; the more than average rainfall just brings it into the limelight."

"More than average" is an understatement in regard to the precipitation levels Dane County has received since June 2007. In the past month 22.6 inches of rain have fallen on Madison, leaving the city burdened by a surplus of 10.3 inches. With excess storm water affecting local communities, it is up to citizens and students to take necessary measures to properly preserve nature.

The city of Madison presents a unique situation when it comes to the rainfall runoff. Water that falls in the city runs off directly into Lake Mendota or Lake Monona, carrying toxins with it. In a nonurban area, this process would occur without such damaging effects, but "densely built environments, such as downtowns and the campus, present a challenge as there is not a lot of open space in which to create the areas to capture, clean and infiltrate all the water that falls on the rooftops and pavements" James said. Madison's urban density would normally cause trouble for those trying to preserve nature, but coupled with the intense rainfall of this past summer, extraordinary measures were necessitated.

Over the summer, for example, the UW campus made several alterations to Lot 34, the parking lot in front of Tripp Hall. Just yards from Lake Mendota, the lot was funneling rainwater runoff directly into the lake. The bank separating the lot from the lakeshore path was overgrown with shallow-rooted plants, encouraging runoff to continue eroding the path as it drains to the lake, carrying fertilizers and other pollutants with it.

The lot was repaved in July 2007, one-fourth of the surface being replaced with pervious asphalt which "allows the water to pass through the pavement into a layer of larger stones that holds the water until it seeps into the ground and returns to groundwater," James said.

This process redirects excess storm water back into the ground, granting time for the absorption of free radicals in the runoff. As an additional improvement, the overgrown forestry on the north end of the lot was torn out and replanted with native, deep-rooted plants to discourage further erosion. When asked about the results of such changes, James replied that they seemed to be "working quite well."

The changes to Lot 34 were vital adjustments in Madison's move to preserve nature's beauty, especially with the lot being in such close proximity to Lake Mendota. However, locations citywide are affecting local ecology, and it is important to make environment-friendly decisions elsewhere.

Rain gardens and green roofs offer inland areas options to contribute to the filtering and redirection of storm water. Rain gardens are turf-lined basins planted with specific soils and plants that absorb water and filter out pollutants. Green roofs operate under the same principles, only the garden is placed on a roof, not only absorbing rain that would normally run off the rooftop but maintaining roof temperature and effectually the building below. Both solutions are readily available to residents of Dane County and are already being utilized at several locations on campus.

Residents of Madison are fortunate to have such lush surroundings, but if taken for granted, the beauty of our environment will suffer along with its occupants. The actions taken this summer by the university's Facilities Planning and Management to improve the Lot 34 area is an example of responsible citizens making a positive effect on their community's ecology.

However, it doesn't require a landscape architecture degree to maintain nature; students and residents alike can help. Restricting use of fertilizers on lawns, planting deep-rooted native plants around neighborhoods and not littering are simple ways to participate in environmental preservation.

Students' money and time are frugally budgeted, often making it difficult to contribute to a local cause. Luckily, storm water runoff is a problem with simple solutions, many of which can involve students. A little effort from each of us will aid those who dedicate their lives to sustaining the environment and ensure the UW campus and surrounding areas have a healthy, bright and beautiful future.

Rachel Krystek ([email protected]) . is a sophomore majoring in journalism

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

8 older comments

user-pic

This is a very pertinent issue in the isthmus and surrounding areas. However, this article could have poked a little deeper into the problem.

Specifically, there are two tidbits that could be improved:

“… it doesn't require a landscape architecture degree to maintain nature” —It ain’t about maintaining nature, it’s about sustainability of nature. There’s a big difference. And a landscaping architecture degree is certainly not the best qualification for approaching the problem; don’t forget civil engineers, soil scientists, geochemists, biologists, limnologists, etc. But, the article makes a good point: you don’t need to credentials to contribute.

The other tidbit: “When asked about the results of such changes, James replied that they seemed to be "working quite well."” —Well, that sure is quantifiable statement, ain’t it?

user-pic

Any specific ideas of what can students do? Most of us are renting and can’t just rip up the landscaping and for those in a large apartment building, there isn’t really any landscaping to speak of…

user-pic

As an engineer who knows a “little bit” about storm water management, I feel the need to comment. This article is misleading. There is not a simple solution to storm water runoff. The City of Madison’s storm sewer infrastructure is designed to convey storm water to surface water bodies, period. Whether it be the lakes, rivers or Arboretum ponds. Sure, adding impervious pavement to one section of a parking lot will make a tiny impact, no changes will be made until the city has a complete storm water management plan modification. Until then, all the water from the city will continue to flow into the lakes and rivers. Next time you write an article about storm water, try to include some key words as: “peak flows, design storms, and infiltration capacity.” I agree with the previous comment, a landscape architect is not the person to be quoting here, unless you are worried about the flower bed outside Ag Hall.

user-pic

Maybe they can make water flow uphill with some clever slogans?

user-pic

the comment ‘landscape architect is not the person to be quoting here, unless you are worried about the flower bed outside Ag Hall.’ from Anonymous (October 9, 2007 @ 4:12pm) is the typical response that comes from old engineers who have no clue what landscape architects actually do. Maybe the engineer has never actually worked in a private practice or has never worked with a ‘qualified’ landscape architect. Please do not continue the myth or stereotype of landscape architects as gardeners as most engineers solution to stormwater is to provide a pipe the diameter of a paint can.

user-pic

12:09am — “Please do not continue the myth or stereotype of landscape architects as gardeners as most engineers solution to stormwater is to provide a pipe the diameter of a paint can.”

I wish I could understand this sentence. Anyway, your point about a “qualified” landscape architect is spot on. This persons concerns about quality issues, but may have no quantitative competence.

user-pic

In response to (October 10, 2007 @ 12:09am):

I feel it is necessary to enlighten you on some interesting details. 1. I am not an old engineer by any means, in fact, I am quite young and sharp on my skills. 2. I have worked and continue to work in private practice. I have also worked extensively with a qualified landscape architect. In fact, much of my experience lies in the areas of landscape design and construction, combined with engineering 3. Well fine, a landscape architect is more than just a gardener. However, until you have exposed yourself to the rigors of fluid mechanics, hydro-physics, hydro-science, watershed engineering, drainage, and computer modeling coursework, you and the landscape architect are NOT qualified to design or analyze stormwater systems. Nor are you qualified to make comments about engineers not knowing about stormwater management.

Engineers are some of the few people that recognize the importance of incorporating sustainability in engineering practice. We don’t stop however, when we hear about one portion of a parking lot being paved with permeable asphalt or tell everyone to build a rain garden. We look to come up with new designs to retrofit the existing structures. In fact, the private consulting firm for whom I work, is in the process of creating new stormwater management plans for state municipalities. So, in response to your comment, don’t be so quick to generalize the engineers, without them, there would be no landscapes for you to design.

user-pic

In respones to (October 10, 2007 @ 3:26pm) So your experience lies in working in landscape design and construction which oftens deals with the micro and not the macro such as Landscape Architecture. And yes I am not qualified to deal with the technical aspects of hydrological engineering. However your first generalisation about landscape architects as gardeners let you down and paints you as not understanding an LA’s role and your second generalisation that without engineers there would be no landscapes to design also paints you as inexperienced when dealing with the role of landscape architects/architecure (not landscape design). Yes, we need engineers to design stormwater systems and on neally every project they that I have worked on in Australia, Canada, China and S.E. Asia, Engineers are the subconsultants to Urban Designers and Landscape Architects who design the whole cities and have Engineers as subconsultants so without Landscape Architects and Urban Planners, most Engineers need us. Lets just we leave it as we agree to disagree and that I apologise for my last generalisation about Engineers, although there are Engineers and there are Engineers and there are landscape architects and there are Landscape Architects. Maybe your opinion will change when you work with many other different landscape architects to understand what our role is in the Built Environment Design Professions.

Donate