Opinion: Editorial

Ante up

On the agenda for the University of Wisconsin Board of Regents today is a plan proposed by Regent President Mark Bradley to increase chancellor salaries at UW-Madison and 11 other system schools. With three open chancellor positions, including the one at this flagship university, there is hardly a better time for the regents to approve a raise.

Sure, Chancellor John Wiley’s annual paycheck of more than $300,000, along with enviable perquisites including free housing and a box at Camp Randall Stadium, is nothing to sneeze at. But when compared to chancellor compensation at other public universities across the country, UW-Madison’s payout just doesn�t stack up.

According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, the chancellor position at UW-Madison pays 21 percent less than the average salary at peer institutions. As we have noted before, the head honcho positions at Purdue and Ohio State universities both come with salaries that are more than double the current UW-Madison chancellor�s pay. If UW hopes to compete with rival schools for the best candidates, including Purdue and Ohio State, we have to at least be in the same ballpark.

To be sure, universities outspending us for their chancellors are not limited to Purdue and Ohio State. As of last year, 43 university leaders raked in more than $500,000. As more schools continue to commit the big bucks for top candidates, UW-Madison would be wise not to fall too far behind.

This is especially true in the wake of steadily decreasing state support for the UW System, making the position of head fundraiser especially valuable to the university. Mr. Wiley has proven remarkably successful in the fundraising game, but outstanding talent and qualifications like his come at a price.

Of course, there should be a reasonable limit to the salary inflation, and the next UW-Madison chancellor need not be paid as much as those in similar positions at Purdue and Ohio State. However, Mr. Bradley�s proposed range of $369,000 to $452,000, which would put UW-Madison within the average salary range of its peer institutions, is a good one. We encourage the Board to move ahead with this proposal and give UW a better chance at securing a top-notch replacement for Mr. Wiley.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

4 older comments

user-pic

That’s a nice salary level. Running the UW can be akin to running a Fortune 500 company, and it takes a special kind of person and leader to do so. As the supply is limited and the demand is relatively high, the market price will be close to half a million dollars per year.

user-pic

How about increased pay for professors too? Maybe that would help.

user-pic

Remember this article next time the BH Editorial Board hollers about raising worker salaries to a living wage, increasing TA pay and benefits, and raising seg fees. Reeks of hypocrisy.

user-pic

I am hard pressed to recognize the importance of raising some one’s salary from an already ridiculous level to an even higher one. All the while so many people in UW system fight just to pay their bills every month and we are talking raisings for the “head honcho.” How about a living wage and full time hours for everyone in UW system first?

Donate