Opinion: Guest column

Lottery ticket system a snub to seniors

Like a lot of students who checked their inboxes to see if they received student season football tickets in July, I’m pissed. As it turns out, I made the mistake of assuming that after consistently receiving season tickets as an underclassman, I’d be virtually guaranteed tickets as a senior. I was wrong.

So what is the most boneheaded decision the UW-Athletic Department could’ve made last year?

Breathalyzing fans at the entrance of Camp Randall? Suspending Lance Smith? No. The worst decision in the history of UW sports came when the Athletic Department decided to change the student season football ticket allocation process to a weighted lottery system that ensures each class the same number of tickets.

I’ll be honest, the Athletic Department’s decision ranks up there with the all-time worst decisions ever made, including a Cher farewell tour and Leprechaun 4.

Who thought it was a good idea to guarantee that freshmen and sophomores should be entitled to as many seats as juniors and seniors?

I’ll tell you who: Underclassmen. The Athletic Department validated its decision to move to a weighted lottery system by saying it surveyed students at random to see if they were pleased with the current lottery system. Oddly enough, the students weren’t happy, which is ironic, seeing as every student I’ve spoken with is thoroughly displeased with the new system.

Here’s the other thing. Surveys are fundamentally biased: people who are upset are the ones most likely to respond to them.

See, there’s a saying that goes “leave well enough alone.”

Any UW student who has stood in the stands on game day understands there is a natural order to the student section. Upperclassmen sit in P. Underclassmen put in their time sitting in underclassmen sections with the understanding that when they are upperclassmen, they will be able to sit in Section P and enjoy the same privileges — or at least get season tickets. Instead, the Athletic Department felt it necessary to tamper with a tradition it deemed in need of dire repair for the “well-being of [its] patrons.” Evidently, in a rush to appease dissatisfied students, the Athletic Department missed out on that finer point.

Now, in addition to screwing a large number of upperclassmen out of season tickets, the Athletic Department has delivered the student body another slap in the face by removing the upperclassmen section. And while it’s likely the Athletic Department will deny that the sole motivation for removing Section P had anything to do with the culture of alcohol consumption on campus, every student knows that this was just another ploy by the administration to curb student drinking under the guise of protecting students’ well-being.

Perhaps worst of all, however, is the fact that the Athletic Department’s decision to move to a weighted lottery system spoiled game day not only for the people who didn’t get season tickets, but for the people who did. What good are season tickets if you can’t be in the stands to enjoy the game with a few friends?

Of course, all of this fails to mention the ever-growing black market the Athletic Department is creating for student season tickets by increasing demand. But what I find to be the most ironic of all is that if the Athletic Department didn’t want to see an empty student section before kickoff, why did they go along with a decision to alienate the most dedicated football fans in the first place?

But don’t just ask me. I won’t be the only senior sitting in my apartment this football season.

Joe Pfister ([email protected]) is a senior majoring in English and political science.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

3 older comments

user-pic

I wonder how much ticket demand would diminish if a UW student ID were required along with the ticket in order to get into the student section.

user-pic

This sounds like a whiny undergrad upset that he didn’t get tickets for a change. However, the number of seniors is greater than the number of freshmen here, so seniors do have a much, much worse chance than before.

—A season ticket holding grad student

user-pic

While some seniors may not have gotten tickets many more seniors actually did get tickets than freshmen. I think it was something like 68% vs 40something %…..

Would you still be complaining if you didn’t get tickets with the old system? You would? That’s what I thought. Just shut up and deal with it…

Donate