Opinion: Letter

ASM sunk in political science sandbox

In its new constitution, the Associated Students of Madison proposes to throw out the current system of representation and replace it with the “Galactic Empire” of student government. The entire document feels as if it were written by a political science major with a pocket constitution and severe delusions of grandeur. (I should know; I am one.)

Let’s face facts: ASM should operate as the voice of the students of UW-Madison and it claims to do so. However, ASM is so unimportant to the average UW student that most aren’t aware they’re part of the group. As it is, most students see ASM as a free bus pass and a bunch of snobby poli-sci majors “playing government” with their segregated fees. This is the real issue that ASM must solve.

I hate to sound like Ronald Reagan, but the proposed bigger government isn’t the solution. Entrusting a president with expansive veto power, creating an executive cabinet and turning the Student Council into a vast oversight committee is the wrong idea. It is simply providing more evidence to the 94 percent of students who feel that it’s not worth spending five minutes voting for their representatives from the comfort of their laptops.

Rather than restructuring itself, ASM should focus instead on becoming a more representative organization by using its current structure more effectively. By making the students of Madison feel they really are part of ASM, ASM could increase its legitimacy and make real changes that help UW’s students. I propose the following changes:

ASM should expand the current Legislative Affairs Committee and make its members directly elected rather than volunteers.

Stricter standards for constituent contact should be set for members of the Student Council. A new committee focusing solely on learning the issues important to the students of UW should be established. Surveys should be conducted. Real, genuine, person-to-person contact rather than a questionnaire buried among The Badger Beat, JSM advertisements and yet another e-mail from David Plouffe urging you to send Barack more cash. If ASM doesn’t address its constituent problem soon, history may repeat itself on the UW campus. As our founding fathers taught us, a government that does not represent its constituents cannot stand. Or, in ASM’s case, it may slowly fade into irrelevance.

Tyler Junger

Student Services Finance Committee candidate

sophomore, political science

[email protected]

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

3 older comments

user-pic

I speak from experience when I say that SSFC members are by far the most experienced people to be dictating what ASM committees like Leg. Affairs should or shouldn’t be doing. SSFC and Finance Committee members are so intimately involved in the grassroots organizing aspect of ASM, I would totally never doubt what a current candidate for office would have to say about this. Mr. Junger clearly has years of experience working with and observing the work of ASM’s interns and volunteers and knows best how to criticize them, and totally not for political gain or anything. - Germain Q. Stemme

user-pic

Germain-

You understand that sarcasm is only funny when it is cleaver. Sardonic diatribes about your resentment for life does not constitute productive discourse.

Who cares if the kid is running for SSFC. He is a member of the student body, which makes his concerns as legitimate as yours.

I think the entire point is that you do not need years of experience with ASM to have thoughts about the restructuring. I certainly have never heard of a Germain Q. Stemme participating in Student Government. I know Germain E. (the original Stemme), but he was able to make a positive contribution.

Alex Gallagher

user-pic

why you have to go bashing reagan like that?

Donate