Opinion

McCain-Palin’s secret tax increase

When she wasn’t sidestepping questions during Thursday’s vice presidential debate, Gov. Sarah Palin managed to string a couple sentences together about her ticket’s health care plan.

“[John McCain is] proposing a $5,000 tax credit for families so that they can get out there and they can purchase their own health care coverage. That’s a smart thing to do.”

The moderator, Gwen Ifill, might have followed up by asking why providing a puny $5,000 tax credit when the average family health insurance policy costs more than $12,000 is a “smart thing to do.” But no matter, Palin continued by claiming the plan is “budget neutral” which should tell you everything you need to know about the plan: It’s a complete sham that doesn’t take health care reform seriously.

As Sen. Joe Biden characterized it, “It’s with one hand you giveth, the other you take it.” McCain proposes to pay for his health care plan by revoking employers’ tax breaks for providing health insurance. This will be the first time in American history that health benefits have been considered taxable income. Sixty percent of Americans, 160 million, receive health insurance through their employers.

Unlike all those phony attack ads saying one candidate or another voted 300 bazillion times for higher taxes and killing puppies, McCain is actually proposing the largest tax increase on the middle class in American history. It’s a truly radical policy stance that hasn’t gotten enough attention over the course of the campaign.

If employees’ health benefits are no longer tax-exempt, this will be a strong incentive for them to drop their plans entirely. That will mean millions more uninsured (estimates suggest around 20 million, or one in eight, could lose their employer-provided coverage). McCain hopes to mitigate this by providing a refundable tax credit that can be used in the individual insurance market so people can purchase their own plan or cover out-of-pocket expenses.

But the individual health insurance market is flawed, and it’s not because insurance companies can’t sell their products over state lines. It’s because they can deny access or render its cost almost prohibitive to anyone who is old or has even a relatively minor preexisting condition. It’s also more expensive because risk is being concentrated on individuals rather than pooled with other beneficiaries. The poor, old and sick will find the tax credit to be a real bridge to nowhere. Only the young and healthy will really come out ahead. And remember readers, you’re not going to be young and healthy forever. Just ask McCain.

McCain believes that the fundamental problem with health care in America is that people are using too much of it. That’s incorrect. Americans are using too much of the wrong kind of care, such as expensive and high-tech late interventions in advanced diseases and end-of-life care. But Americans are not using enough preventative care and routine monitoring that save money in the long run.

This is because if you are uninsured or if you have to pay a high deductible for a visit to the doctor, you put off those visits as long as possible. This is sure to increase costs in the long run because people wait until small problems like high cholesterol and chest pain become expensive ones, such as heart disease requiring triple bypass. The government ends up paying for this anyway when the uninsured patient gets rushed to the emergency room and can’t reimburse the hospital.

To be fair to McCain, employer-provided health insurance was an accident of history that operates poorly in practice. Health costs are a rapidly growing, unsustainable burden. Employer-based coverage is an especially great burden for small businesses with small employee risk pools. So any eventual comprehensive health care reform should include a shift away from getting insurance through one’s employer.

But in the absence of a heavily regulated individual market that ensures access to everyone regardless of health for a fair price, taxing health benefits is a recipe for catastrophe for millions. But far from pushing more regulation, McCain wants to deregulate the insurance industry much like the financial services industry. We all know how that turned out.

There isn’t enough column space to discuss Obama’s health care plan in any detail, but suffice it to say he wants to introduce efficiencies into the existing health care structure and offer large subsidies to anyone who can’t afford coverage. The uninsured will be allowed to buy into a public plan that can compete with private plans and convince people that public provision of health care isn’t so scary. Obama’s plan probably won’t do much to restrain costs in the long run and has no mandate that gets everyone covered, but he’s light years ahead of McCain in understanding the problem and proposing solutions that will deliver some essential improvements.

McCain admits he’s never understood the economy as well as he should. That goes double for health care.

Ryan Greenfield ([email protected]) is a senior majoring in political science and economics.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

11 older comments

user-pic

Ryan, if Obama handles health care reform the way he handles financial bailouts, I’d sure hate to see what a penicillin shot’s gonna cost us after January 20th.

user-pic

Good article Ryan. Best part about it - the ad banner on the side that says “A Proven Maverick: McCain/ Palin.” Thank you google adwords.

-Scott

user-pic

Republicans, when you brag about McCain’s “maverick” status, you’re just pointing out that he has liberal tendencies. In fact, McCain has RAISED TAXES 477 times during his career.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpIWbYs8sec

With $700B promised to Wall Street and baby boomers entering social security eligibility, taxes are going to rise. Brace for the pain, America.

user-pic

Millions of the unisured are unisured for only one reason - they have chosen to spend their money on dining out, nicer cars and bigger houses instead of buying insurance.

The government doesn’t do everything it does now so well that I want it to be in complete control of my health care!

“This is because if you are uninsured or if you have to pay a high deductible for a visit to the doctor, you put off those visits as long as possible.”

Whereas if there is no cost people will be comsuming “health care” like there is no tomorrow (probably won’t be - lol). FREE GOODS ARE ALWAYS OVERUSED!!!

Then will come the government controls and health care rationing and long waits and “sorry, you’re not worth saving”.

user-pic

Shhhh, Obama plans to raise EVERYBODY’S taxes!

No company EVER pays any taxes. The customers pay the taxes, just like they pay the company’s rent and electric bills.

Obama plans to increase taxes on the companies. Part of the cost of everthing anyone buys is the taxes collected during the production of the good or service. i.e. I’m thinking that the oil company would be able to charge me less for gasoline if they didn’t have to pay income taxes.

And if the “public plan that can compete with private plans”, with its governmrnt subsidy, runs the privates plans out of business then those insurance companies won’t be paying any taxes now, will they.

user-pic

in response to the 11:09 poster, it is clear you have no idea how much out of pocket insurance really costs. get a clue.

user-pic

“The customers pay the taxes, just like they pay the company’s rent and electric bills”

Rent and electric bills are budgeted and included in the cost of the product.

Profits are not budgeted, just like Clinton’s federal budget surplus. Bush returned the surplus via tax cuts, why shouldn’t companies return their “surplus” to the tax payers/ consumers?

user-pic

to 2:31 who says “why shouldn’t companies return their “surplus” to the tax payers/ consumers”

Some do - they lower prices as costs get lower. But for those that don’t - it’s called BUSINESS - you make a product in order to make money. No company or business has a goal to just break even - the goal is to make a profit. The goal of taxes, however, is to break even.

I really hope you are not a UW student…

user-pic

A true tax “cut” is a reduction in the taxes you’re paying. In contrast, much of the “relief” in Obama’s plan consists of “refundable credit”— Federal payments you get even if you owe no taxes at all.

That’s what folks used to call “welfare.”

And who pays for all those non-productive Obama voter pay-offs? The hard-working productive taxpayers.

That’s not change… it’s the same old Marxism that’s failed before. No wonder global markets are trembling at the prospect of an Obama presidency.

Wake up America. You’re being swindled again.

user-pic

McCain wants to tax health insurance — that’s a whole new category of tax!

But you’ll never hear the mouth-breathing Republicans complain about that. The cognitive dissonance is astounding!

user-pic

2:31 most companies due “return” their “surplus”, just to the people who deserve it, their stockholders in the form of a dividend.

Donate