Opinion: Editorial

Intoxicating inaction

It’s hardly a revelation that Wisconsinites like to drink. For better or worse — and we’re convinced it’s some of each — drinking has long been ingrained in the culture of the state.

Unfortunately, an oftentimes tragic corollary to Wisconsin’s taste for alcohol has been drunken driving. In 2007, 41 percent of fatal traffic accidents in the state involved a driver with a blood alcohol content at or above the .08 legal limit, third highest in the nation according to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration.

The problem is fostered in part by ridiculously lax sanctions for those who drive drunk. Unlike every other state in the nation, Wisconsin treats first-time offenses as simply a traffic citation and not a crime. Second-time offenses are part of the criminal code, but they remain misdemeanors until a person’s fifth offense, when drunken driving finally becomes a felony.

Even then, many offenders avoid serious penalty. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel recently found fewer than half the individuals sentenced for the fifth-time felony in Milwaukee County from 1999 to 2006 went to prison. The reason seems to be the varying sentencing philosophies of judges, with some consistently sending fifth-time offenders to prison and others inclined to let them off with probation.

The Journal Sentinel’s statistics are part of its “Wasted Wisconsin” series, a comprehensive set of articles concluding today that examines the consequences of the state’s drinking culture. It is a revealing series well worth reading.

State legislators should pay particularly close attention to the Journal Sentinel’s findings. It is time — indeed, it is long past time — to criminalize first-time drunken driving offenses. Shifting such cases out of municipal courts would increase court costs for the state, but other states have managed to do it while sending a strong message that driving while intoxicated is not acceptable. Wisconsin additionally needs to make a felony out of third-time drunken driving offenses.

Drunken driving deaths in Wisconsin have declined about 20 percent since the early 1980s. But far more needs to be done. That the state with the highest binge-drinking rate in the nation has such lenient OWI laws is appalling. It needs to change.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

6 older comments

user-pic

It is entirely unfair to punish people so severely merely for driving drunk. Its done done countless times and, much like regular driving, accidents are few and far between. Did you know that drunk driving statistics are alcohol related if the pedestrian is drunk, an empty beer can is found whether the driver was drunk or not, and if the the driver who didn’t cause the accident was drunk. The point is in this country you are innocent until proven guilty and until you have damaged someone or someone’s property there is no reason to be detained for drunk driving. However in the interest of prudence, why not massively increase the penalties so there is no incentive to drive drunk, in the event you actually violate traffic laws. Being a drunk driver should not be illegal, being a drunk BAD driver should be.

user-pic

I read an editorial like this before… oh yeah, it was in the Cardinal LAST YEAR.

user-pic

Wow. Scanner Dan doesn’t like.

user-pic

“Being a drunk driver should not be illegal, being a drunk BAD driver should be.” ..Is that a joke? PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE DRUNK DRIVING PERIOD.

user-pic

MERELY for drunk driving? Mr Anonymous 6:10 am, you need a reality check. Are you really that stupid? How many doctors, neurologists, and normal people do you need to tell you that alcohol severely impairs your motor skills and hand-eye coordination? Translation: ALL drunk driving is BAD drunk driving. The sheer mechanics of it make it impossible to operate a car safely. Maybe you should keep up with your drunk driving though, so when you undoubtedly injure yourself, it will be one less moron on the road. But since I’m a decent human being, I’m going to hope that that DOESN’T happen, and ask you not to drink and drive.

user-pic

im doing a report on students against drunk drivers and i think its ignorant to drive under the influence. Risking lives isn’t funny one of my best friends died in a car crash last year!

Donate