Opinion

Taking a rational look at Mahoney

On Nov. 17, Dane County Sheriff Dave Mahoney’s controversial policy of reporting illegal immigrants whom he takes into custody to Immigration and Customs Enforcement inspired a protest by the student chapter of Progressive Dane, Campus Antiwar Network and the Multicultural Student Coalition. Protesters marched to the City-County building in support of an amendment under consideration by the Dane County Board of Supervisors to move funding from Mahoney’s budget. In an overwhelming defeat for the protesters, the amendment was defeated 30-6.

In this battlefront in a national war over immigration policy, the anti-Mahoney forces do a decent job of critiquing the policy on a local level, citing its violation of a Dane County Board resolution and his authority to enforce federal law as a local official. However, the fundamental dispute is still controlled by emotions about our national immigration policy.

The core of the opposition to Mahoney’s policy rests on some convoluted notion of open borders, where countries have no right to control the movement of people across their boundaries and where people have the right to cross international borders as they please. One does not need to look much further than the “No Human is Illegal” signs carried by protesters. However, Campus Antiwar Network member Rob Lewis summarized quite well the feelings of many of his fellow protesters when he said, “What’s going on is racist and inexcusable. They’re trying to intimidate a group of people in this community and take away their rights.”

In order to see the fatal flaw in their logic one must look no further than something familiar to those whose political beliefs fall somewhere this side of Marxism: private property rights. While our government maintains a monopoly on violating our right to do what we please with our bodies and property through taxes, search warrants, eminent domain and declaring the use of certain substances illegal, they do their best to ensure no one else may do the same by outlawing theft, burglary and trespassing.

Those on the left don’t seem to find too much wrong with the government taking peoples’ property through taxation, but once you manage to acquire property they are some of the strongest advocates of your right to do with it as you please. Want to perform acts in your bedroom that would make ordinary Americans cringe with disgust? No arguments from them. Want to purchase illegal drugs? Not a problem. As long as you pay the sales tax.

The right to privacy derived from property rights that is so strongly supported by progressives means you get to determine not only who listens in on your phone calls and whether or not fetuses are permitted to grow inside your uterus; it also means you get to determine who is allowed into your house or onto your property.

When the question turns from private property to public it is only natural that, just like private property, the owner of the public property ought to decide who is permitted to use the property. In most cases this means that the people, through their government, decide who is permitted to use public property, thus the justification for all of our traffic laws and national parks. Thus when the people of the United States, through Congress, decide who can and cannot come into our country, they do have a basis for deciding that some humans are indeed illegal.

While our national immigration policy is desperately in need of reform — a discussion I will leave for another day — unless we decide we want everyone to come into our country who wants to come, that reform ought not include the relaxing of all of our standards of immigration. It may not be in our best interest to exclude someone who wants to come to our country, but that certainly does not mean that we don’t have a right to do so. Until Sheriff Mahoney can come with some better justifications as to why he has the authority to be the one doing the excluding, it’s probably best that he leave it up to Immigration Control.

Patrick McEwen ([email protected]) is a sophomore majoring in ‘nucyaler’ engineering ;)

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

11 older comments

user-pic

Kyle Szarzynski will destroy you for writing this article. First he will get his PD hack buddies to comment venomously on your article. Then he will write a response article accusing you of being a racist. Then he will call for a protest in front of your house until you recant.

user-pic

I perform acts in my bedroom that make even ME cringe in disgust. - Germaine Q. Stemme

user-pic

DEPORT RON LEWIS!!! NOW!!!

user-pic

Perhaps we should look to Mexico for guidance on dealing with illegal entry?

Do a little research on how Mexico deals with this issue on their southern border and get back to us.

user-pic

Of course the government CAN legally deport people. The question is, should they? If these people are living here and part of our community, it makes no sense to terrorize them in the way Mahoney has done.

These nuances are apparently too complicated for you to understand.

user-pic
Sounds like ordinary Americans have really effing boring sex lives. I’m glad I’m not one of them. Wow. Way to put your philosophy of law above the importance of human rights. You should be proud of yourself. Good job on being born at a location you now believe qualifies you for more basic rights than people born other places on the planet.

“unless we decide we want everyone to come into our country who wants to come” (!) Imagine the horror of Americans not being able to dictate who gets to live where… and on our precious stolen land too!

user-pic

“If these people are living here and part of our community, it makes no sense to terrorize them in the way Mahoney has done.”

You could say the same thing about the Mafia.

user-pic

“Of course the government CAN legally deport people.”

The government can legally do whatever it wants. It gets to decide what is legal and whats not.

user-pic

“Wow. Way to put your philosophy of law above the importance of human rights. You should be proud of yourself.”

Wow. Looks like someone missed the entire argument that was just made. The fundamental purpose behind this column was to morally justify the basis of immigration law as being grounded in human rights.

user-pic

Hey, look at what Mexico does for its poor people. Nada. They’d just as soon let their poor sneak across our border and steal our jobs. Instead of defending their nonexistent right to be here, why not shame Mexico into taking care of its own poor? Anybody ever thought of that? Hello? HELLO!!!

user-pic

Isn’t the richest person in the world a Mexican?

Donate