Certain stories are simply inevitable. Every Super Bowl, you’re bound to read at least one article breaking down how expensive advertising time is. After every election, you’re going to get a piece on the new White House pet. Every month you’re going to be subjected to how bad the Madison police are at finding anything. And every time a building goes up, you’re going to eventually learn how the construction is way over budget.
New Union South, welcome to the club.
According to the Wisconsin State Journal, the creation of the new union will cost over $7 million more than previously expected, putting the current final cost at $94.8 million. Undoubtedly, that’s some serious coinage, especially for a building that’s more a 2.0 version of its predecessor than anything else, but it’s safe to say that with or without the $7 million, the new union would still fall under the category of “expensive.” However, while it’s easy to predict that this would happen, it’s even easier to predict what will happen next. Let the public outcry begin.
Humans are separated from animals by the ability to dunk a basketball and a race-wide knack for complaining, and while not all of us choose to throw down on the hardwood, we all love to belly moan. Specifically, we all complain about money, and when somebody uses our money for something we’re not 100 percent behind, the collective grumblings rise like a tidal wave. It happens with stadiums, theaters and parks — although rarely with prisons, so I guess that means something — and we’ve already seen it once with the new union when various student organizations rallied against the construction’s cost to students. But this community Scrooge-ness needs to waddle away, not only because the union is going to be built whether we like it or not, but also because it truly will be an asset to this campus.
The old Union South was a mausoleum. The upstairs was sterile and the downstairs felt like that youth hangout where you could bowl, eat snacks and rap about Christ. It lacked the history and location of Memorial Union and never adopted the same role as its older brother. At its heart, a union should be an extension of the university experience, both as a place for learning and social interaction. Unfortunately, the only thing anyone ever learned at the old Union South was how expensive replacement student ID cards are.
The new union is not only an attempt to restore this sense of community, but to boost the social stock of the university as a whole. You can make the argument that this money is better spent on improving teacher benefits, keeping tuition down, or paying for big time football recruits, but those all come and go. If built right — and “right” is almost always synonymous with “expensive” — the new union will be an invaluable addition to the university. Face it, the campus is getting old, and not in the rustic, East Coast way. It’s always felt ironic that the building we call Humanities looks about as humane as an oversized concrete bunker. A university is a brand, and to keep that brand attractive, improvements need to be made.
So yes, the new union is over budget, and yes, much of the additional money to cover that will come from student fees, but this is the compromise we all make when we decide to attend the University of Wisconsin. The university is committed to offering a top-rate education to those who attend, and in turn, we’re asked to help keep it appealing to future generations of students. Even though $94 million dollars can buy a ton of ramen, the average cynic should know the value of a new union exceeds what any of us will pay for it during our time here. And the hardcore cynic should know they won’t really start asking for money until it’s half built, and by then, there’s no turning back.
Sean Kittridge ([email protected]) is a junior majoring in journalism






IP hash: 6d5b2e25
“And the hardcore cynic should know they won�t really start asking for money until it�s half built, and by then, there�s no turning back”
SSFC Chair Kurt Gosselin
IP hash: 98979971
the new Student Activities Center didn’t go over budget…so, that sort of shoots down your argument’s basic premise.
Your PR piece for the Union is unlikely to have the desired effect. Students got railroaded and they are angry. The Union would do better to cancel the demolition and construction. A lot of bitter, angry students who have a long, long memory (well into the 2060s) are not good enemies to make…
IP hash: f57c9169
No, students just don’t care.
IP hash: fbec658b
“the new Student Activities Center didn’t go over budget…so, that sort of shoots down your argument’s basic premise.”
The new Student Activities Center was supposed to be a free-standing tower and the Lucky building was supposed to be UW Residence Halls.
Now, it is a half-empty sad commercialized piece of property where it costs me $10 for lunch in a food court that is both dead and dead-end oriented (I can’t ever seem to find the people I come with because the booths are too tall).
It offers high-end luxury apartments, a walgreens, 2 floors of student activity space (without the deli as designed) that barely meets the needs of existing student organizations, and a bunch of empty hopes: ESPN Zone, Brass Rail, Grocery store, etc.
The east campus pedestrian mall has no plant life and is just a cute way of disguising concrete.
It’s ridiculous that you can’t get from the food court to the student activity center. There are no vending machines. The key system is a mess.
BUT! You’re right…the SAC did not go over budget. Maybe the Union should downsize to a 2-floor condo instead?
IP hash: 33273537
When students voted on this they were told that it would cost $67 million. (source: http://www.unionvote.wisc.edu/finance.html ). The cost is now $94.8 million!
IP hash: b17f487a
Um, I’m not even going to be able to use this damn building. I’ll have graduated right before its expected opening date. So, no, I don’t think it’s fair to be pulling money out of my wallet for something I will never get to use. That sucks.