Opinion: Editorial

End judicial elections

I completely understand our Editorial Board’s decision to endorse a candidate in today’s state Supreme Court election. The people of the state of Wisconsin are entrusted with the ability to make sound judgments about who should sit on the state’s highest court — that’s the way it is.

But I disagree with the system, and that’s my reasoning for not supporting either Shirley Abrahamson or Randy Koschnick. I didn’t vote for Louis Butler or Michael Gableman last year, and I intend on passing over the race when I fill out my ballot again this year. Call me irresponsible, but I simply don’t believe it’s right.

I have come to accept the fact money drives both state and federal elections for executive and legislative races. It is for that reason that, to me, the judicial branch of our government should be held to the highest of standards and should be composed of individuals selected by the governor and confirmed by the Legislature.

The influence of Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce essentially decided last year’s Supreme Court election. The millions of dollars poured into Gableman’s campaign were enough to put him over the top. Money and smear campaigns determined the newest member of the state’s most important judicial body. And this year, with Abrahamson at such an enormous financial advantage, she will most certainly win today. Regardless of a candidate’s qualifications or beliefs, the system is clearly flawed.

I refuse to go along with such a terrible method of selecting justices. They do it right at the federal level, and it’s time we do it right here in Wisconsin.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

3 older comments

user-pic

While I agree with the substance of this editorial, who actually wrote it? The byline says “Badger Herald Editorial Board,” but every other statement begins with “I.” “I understand,” “I disagree,” “I have,” “I refuse” — this was written by ONE person. Put your own name on it and don’t hide behind the editorial board.

user-pic

8:38, That’s weird; this was actually written by Tom Schalmo in dissent. I’ll try to clear this up as soon as possible.

Sam

user-pic

i concur with Tony’s piece.

Donate