It’s your family’s annual Christmas party and everyone is gathered at the dinner table eating figgy pudding and talking about their Black Friday shopping experiences. All of a sudden, Uncle Sal clears his throat and announces to the room that he is dating a man. The room goes silent. Grandma drops her spoon and bursts into tears. Grandpa storms out and everyone else sits and stares at the turkey carcass sitting on the table, uncomfortable and hesitant to say anything about the big elephant that just appeared in the room.
There exists an unwritten list of taboo subjects that are considered inappropriate to discuss in the company of one’s peers and acquaintances, among them is homosexuality. To avoid confrontation and offending others, it is a common practice to avoid the issues of race, religion, sexual preference, class, etc. Essentially, any subject that sparks more debate than say, whether it’s cold in Wisconsin during the winter months, is avoided.
As a culture, we are hypersensitive to these subjects because they are concepts that people usually have pretty strong and passionate opinions about. Recently, the editors of The Badger Herald prompted its opinion staff and the rest of our campus to respond to another issue of contention: diversity.
I am no stranger to this term. I went to an inner city high school whose population was more diverse than a bag of Jelly Bellys. It was not OK, however, to discuss this fact with anyone within the walls of our school. It was also encouraged that we shouldn’t converse about the varying socioeconomic statuses of the students, sexual preference or disabilities. The administration, instead of fostering healthy conversation among its students about the similarities and differences that exist between all peoples, regardless of their race, gender or creed, decided to silence these discussions for fear that they might be offensive or stereotypical.
Guess what? My school’s administrators were right to fear these kinds of responses. It’s a natural response to want to defend one’s opinions and backgrounds. Unfortunately, the tone in which we approach talking to people about their beliefs and opinions is one of hesitation and with the expectation that our opinions will be disregarded, or worse, challenged.
This mindset is detrimental to furthering acceptance among the students on this campus. Instead of going into a situation with the attitude of “it’s my way or the highway,” we need to recognize no one person will ever agree with you on every subject. Let’s agree to disagree. By listening to others’ opinions and expressing your thoughts in a tactful way, you will actually strengthen any argument you have because you will be able to play devil’s advocate.
Our hesitation to talk about taboos is unsubstantiated, because in truth, we are all entitled to our opinions. Diversity, whatever your definition of it is and whichever context in which you are thinking of it in, is a fact of life. Accept it and move on.
The next time someone comes up to you on the street and wants to talk about the pros and cons of universal health care or whether Oprah should retire, instead of jumping on the offensive, take a step back and breathe (or if you don’t know this person who randomly approached you on the street, run away.) Remember, too, that when Uncle Sal decides to have another revelation over fruitcake and apple cider, remember his choices and his beliefs are his own and need to be respected.
This lesson will not only allow you to get through your next social “awkward turtle” moment, but it will also make it easier to digest and understand all the discussions we are having about diversity and its meaning.
Chelsea Lawliss ([email protected]) is a sophomore intending to major in journalism.





IP hash: 48f88df9
Chelsea, go fuck yourself! All this week so far we’ve been bombarded by race-baiting, false accusations of homophobia and God knows what the hell else the BH will print. If you libtards really want to impress, how’s about fixing the economy and getting our troops home, not this tired bullshit!
IP hash: d0ca982a
So it OK for it to be taboo to teach young children about fisting or promoting NAMBLA in grade school?
Or is that also the stuff of teachable moments?
IP hash: 1fd9984b
What a fucking joke. Intending to major in journalism? How about writing about something that isn’t complete bullshit? 3rd straight horrible article I’ve seen from this chick. Go read some news and write about something substantial for a change.
IP hash: f9f89bf2
How about adding something constructive to the discussion here, jerk? Social taboos and current events are interrelated and one often stems from the other - this isn’t as insubstantial as you’re claiming.
IP hash: 64e80f47
Anonymous 1: Responses such as these are extremely immature and devalue any argument you may wish to present. Please grow up.
Anonymous 2: When teaching younger children about heterosexual couples, we don’t mention doggy-style, vibrators, or that 70 year old men sometimes marry 18 year old women. Talking about homosexuality can be done at age appropriate levels.
Respect goes both ways and can open the door to many fruitful conversations. That doesn’t mean everyone will agree but at least we can attempt to understand both sides.
IP hash: 83affb58
Yeah, and it’s also extremely immature when you stand out in the middle of the street screaming about “Honkies, men should be castrated and Mr. Straight is so insecure about his own sexuality that he has to repress it by lashing out with his pint-size dick.”
Minorities do a lot of stereotyping of their own. Is it ignorance or is it for sheer entertainment? Tolerance works both ways, asshole.
IP hash: f3de2dad
To IP hash ec5b31c4: I don’t know who you are, but please go away. Your offensive and bigoted comments on ALL the articles about diversity only serve to show that you are ignorant and bitter. Go back to trolling on 4chan or wherever you came from and let us discuss the issue of diversity in a reasonable and compassionate way.
IP hash: 3658fffb
Offensive? Bigoted? Maybe you just have a problem with the truth. Typical Madison liberal!
IP hash: d0ca982a
“Talking about homosexuality can be done at age appropriate levels.”
No doubt about it, perhaps Barry HO should have appointed someone who had a record of doing that.
IP hash: 4b0b29c6
I think the article is quite insightful. For those of you saying write about something substantial—like fixing the economy and sending our troops home—I’d like to know your operating definition of “substantial”. I think this article is quite substantial because it discusses something that the readers can can influence—their interactions with others. Although articles in a student newspaper about national issues are important to keep discussion and awareness high, I think we can all agree that we’d be shocked if a student article about the recent troop surge actually significantly altered the Obama Administration’s policies. So, instead of throwing insults and sarcastically asking if certain actions follow from her statements, even though it’s obvious they don’t, try actually reflecting on an article that a student put time and thought into because she wanted to share it with the campus.
IP hash: 3658fffb
Not if it means the entire BH editorial staff writes a “substantial” number of articles about one topic only, all published on the same day. Bizarre is a more befitting word.