Opinion: Column

The slow rot of society sped up in ’00s

Earlier this year, I was watching CNN while waiting for a plane at Madison’s airport. Wolf Blitzer was leading a discussion on how 24-hour news networks have negatively affected the media by blending entertainment and news. After cutting the interview short, he raised his voice and told viewers to come back after the commercial break to hear about Jon Gosselin’s latest scandal.

It was the textbook definition of a *facepalm* moment. But it illustrates what I think has characterized the ’00s — a time of social and political digression not noticed even when shoved in our face.

Simply put: It’s a decade in which America failed to move forward. A decade in which, time and time again, our country and our society had the best intentions, yet fell flat on our face each and every time.

While we didn’t take part in every facet of this digression, we were there every step of the way — for both the critical events and the trends.

We saw that second plane hit Tower 2. We saw Colin Powell dangle that vial of anthrax in front of the United Nations Security Council. We saw devastating attacks in London, Madrid and Mumbai. We saw the flooded black neighborhoods in New Orleans. We saw our economy reach near collapse.

We’ve all heard the arguments about why the responses to these events were misguided at best and criminal at worst. The failed policies of George W. Bush are widely talked about, as are the dubious economic plans of Barack Obama. I’ll stop there, since we as a society had regrettably limited control over American tanks in Baghdad or FEMA’s failings.

But everyday Americans played a huge role in the societal transgressions of this decade that, in many ways, are worse than nation-building or mortgage-backed securities.

We’ve seen MSNBC, Fox News and CNN turn journalism into a constant exercise in partisan hackery and absurdity, and we’ve taken part it. We’ve clicked on Matt Drudge’s bastardization of politics 7.5 billion times in the past year. We’ve watched the intensely personal moments of stars like Britney Spears, Anna Nicole Smith, Lindsay Lohan and, most recently, Tiger Woods, and have somehow convinced ourselves we actually care about their missteps. We fawn over contestants on “American Idol” and “Dancing with the Stars.”

More than anything political or economic, the aughts will be characterized as a period in which society lost a sense of what is deserving of its attention. We no longer understand when to make a big deal about something — not the case 10 years ago.

Think about it. The biggest scandals of the ’80s and ’90s were Iran-Contra, Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, Whitewater and Monicagate. All were political in some sense.

But what sticks out for the ’00s? Where Anna Nicole’s remains are? Nipplegate? Hilton’s drunken driving escapades? “I’mma let you finish”?

Certainly nothing overly political comes right to mind, even the scandals that do revolve around more salacious events — Larry Craig, Mark Foley, Jim McGreevey, Eliot Spitzer. We spent much more time thinking, reading and hearing about these things than we did about Scooter Libby, warrantless surveillance, the Downing Street memo or the fact that Bush fired seven federal prosecutors without giving a reason.

I truly think we are losing the ability to determine what is and isn’t news. Sure, this is the fault of journalists for catering to what society wants, but it’s more society’s fault for eating it up and demanding more and more.

This can only get worse in the ’10s. As pointed out by a Wall Street Journal columnist this week, see the Taiwanese re-creation of what happened with the Tiger Woods scandal (http://tinyurl.com/yl9h6x6) as a frightening example of what news could become.

So I ask of my fellow students, my fellow Madisonians and my fellow Americans: Be critical of what you see in the media at all times. Deconstruct and analyze advertisements you find particularly striking. Spend more time reading the Financial Times and less listening to your favorite talking head. Watch the evening news and close that Drudge tab constantly open on your Firefox. Stay far away form Perez Hilton and stop caring about the Gosselin family.

I’d like to think, as a hilarious Onion article pointed out, that 2009 is the nadir of Western civilization. But I doubt it.

We must work together to reverse the superficial nature of the ’00s. If we don’t, I’m absolutely terrified of how far society will fall in the next decade.

Kevin Bargnes ([email protected]) is a junior majoring in journalism.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

14 older comments

user-pic

Awesome article, Kevin. You should read some Martin Kaplan and Neil Postman if you haven’t yet. The arguments you make and the arguments they make are very similar.

user-pic

Haha. I read Postman freshman year. i disagreed at the time but I should revisit and I’m sure I’d identify with him a hell of a lot more.

-Kevin

user-pic

Hi, Kevin. I’m one of the folks who posted on your column last week and, well, I didn’t write anything nice. After reading this column, I take everything back. I was a dick, I admit it. With that out of the way, Let’s move on.

The subject of your column this week is what should really be on every American’s mind. Yes, we do worry about things that aren’t worth worrying about. Whether we watch all that drivel for entertainment or just because there’s nothing better on, it all only serves to distract us from the real issue-that our society is going down the tubes.

While our economy teeters on verge of collapse, propped up only by the record spending by Congress and the president, we forget that, down the road, we are the ones who will be paying it off. Another disturbing thought is what we might do if/when we finally hit bottom and the only way to survive is to mug someone or steal something, even if it means taking our neighbor’s life to put food on our own table. Many of us had hoped that Obama’s election in November 2008 would bring a new era of promise. Though he’s been in office for barely a year, many of us are already losing faith. He has continued to allow the big banks to squander federal money, and even though most of the recipients have repaid it, virtually none of it was ever spent to stimulate the economy. We’re holding steady…for now. But how long will it be before it all changes, and will it change for better or for worse? That’s the part that keeps us on edge.

The current academic year is almost half over. Even the business majors who are graduating in June are just as uncertain about their future as they are eager to step up to the podium, grab that sheepskin and get the hell outta here. And then there are the rest of us, long since graduated or never went to college, let alone finished high school. Will it really matter ten years from now what educational background we have if there’s a good chance we’ll end up like a third-world country. Perish the thought, but don’t count on anything getting any better without some heads rolling.

Getting back to Obama-and the folks in Congress, does anyone else besides me wonder if any elected officeholder in Washington really calls the shots anymore? Why does it always seem that the most powerful people in government are bending over for the most powerful people in the private sector? Why can’t they just get a subpoena or a warrant and show up at corporate headquarters. It was very entertaining to watch Michael Moore in Capitalism: A Love Story show up at AIG in a Brink’s truck and money bags, yelling through a bullhorn that the CEOs are under arrest. But wouldn’t it be mind-blowing if actual federal officers showed up instead, with warrants in hand? So why isn’t it happening? What’s stopping our own fearless leaders, the same leaders who sent our troops off to fight terrorists and tyrants, from hauling in the greedy bastards on Wall Street in for questioning?

Our new president, the one pinned our hopes on, has already started to disappoint. There are plenty of things he could be doing right now to turn the tide. Instead, he appears to be doing what unseen hands are directing him to do, while at the same time doing his best to give us the impression that he is on control and that America is on the mend. Sometimes, I wish that, with every second of news coverage of every politician, there would be subtitles appearing onscreen that revealed what was really on their minds. Or if politicians really have souls.

And the most pressing question on my mind these days: How much of this pretense, this canned, off-the-teleprompter BS are we willing to sit back and listen to before we finally decide that we’ve had enough? What will it take for us to finally stop allowing so much division among ourselves and accept the fact that too few of us will ever be the CEO, the president, the talk show host, the movie star or the star athlete that practically all of us hoped to be. Maybe if we were more concerned with improving the quality of life and financial security of even our lowliest citizens, then being just another face in the crowd wouldn’t make us feel so insignificant, so unimportant. We’re all important. That’s why God put us here. Let’s get busy.

user-pic

There exists a major problem in the basic premise of this argument. You claim the things that took our attention previoulsy were “Iran-Contra, Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, Whitewater and Monicagate” and then list these trivial celebrity meltdowns as the attention getters of the 2000’s.

This is problematic because you neglect major worldwide scandals that dominated news cycles in the 2000’s. I would say that the major 00’s scandals were the Gore-Bush election, the Bush-adminstrations refocusing the worlds attention to invade Iraq, the mis-handling of the Katrina aftermath, the lack of regulation that allowed credit-default swaps, sub-prime mortgages, etc, and Madoff.

In addition, you were probably just too young to realize that the 90’s media was DOMINATED as well by stupid trivial celebrity bullshit. For example:

  • Pamela and Tommy Lee’s sex type
  • O.J.’s murder trial
  • Lorenna Bobbit cuts off her husbands penis
  • Hugh Grant
  • Joey Butafucco
  • Nancy Kerrigan and Tonya Harding

These were all huge newsmakers.

You are right that this is a problem but is it once that is isolated to the 00’s? Absolutely not. Always fear the argument that things are so much different now than they were in the “good old days,”….this is rarely actually the case.

user-pic

Thank you. Exactly what I was thinking…

user-pic

Yeah, I’ve heard this argument and I meant to discuss it but ran out of space.

True, the downfall of society began in the 90s, but I believe the 90s were characterized by the dawn of the information age. An increase in superficiality is an inevitable result of that.

The problem is that this superficiality went to a ridiculous extent in the 00s, and that’s why I believe it will, in the long run, be the greatest legacy of the decade.

-Kevin

user-pic

You missed my point. This did not start in the 90s either:

80s:

-Rob Lowe’s sex tape -Milli Vanilli -Pete Rose betting scandal -Gary Hart has an affair w/ Donna Rice, ruining a Presidential chance -Jimmy Swagart -Jim Bakker

70s:

-Roman Polanski -Janis Joplin -CHarles Manson -Patty Hearst -Sonny and Cher;s relationship fallout -Farrah Fawcett leaves Charlies Angels -Elvis dies -Major widespread drug use

All this takes is a little research and you realize this phenomenon, like most, is not new. You are just young and it seemes new…but when your 18 years old, everything is new.

user-pic

Collapse the system with Cloward-Piven strategy. Then we can go get our money. http://cloward-piven.com/

user-pic

Yes, let’s bring on socialism. Then we can “get our money”. Socialism is batting around .000 when it comes to putting money in the ordinary public’s pockets, how in the world would that help anything?

user-pic

The problem with socialism it that you eventually run out of other people’s money.

user-pic

Here’s a two-step solution:

  1. A federal tax revolt, where we all pay our federal taxes to our state. Corporate and business taxes, personal income taxes, the whole shootin’ match, just pay it to your state.

  2. Secession. It won’t have to be forever, just long enough to bring every crooked politician in Washington down on his/her knees. Absence makes the heart grow fonder. When they see that we can keep our wheels turning without them, like we did for the first 140 years of US history, they’ll learn who really calls the shots.

Americans need to be reminded once again that it is they who keep this country strong, not the snake oil salesmen who promise us a cure-all, then blow out of town with our hard-earned money. Time for a second American Revolution. Shall we?

user-pic

“I truly think we are losing the ability to determine what is and isn�t news.”

The problem is wider than the news. Our culture is increasingly becoming adverse to facts and reason. (News being one category of facts.)

Witness the global warming fiasco. The widespread willingness of the mainstream media, university professors, scientists and most other intellectuals to evade facts they don’t want to hear is truly staggering.

The recent “climategate” emails are only the latest in a trail of fraud, deception and evasion that has been going on for decades at the IPCC and global warming politics in general.

And despite the massive impact this alleged science has on our lives, there has been a concerted effort to ignore, evade and suppress the truth in order to hold on to environmentalist ideology.

The same aversion to facts and reason is true in the health care debate, financial crisis, etc.

user-pic

You know, you’re right. If it only were the 1980’s, I would never have had the ability to read this “superficial” online article, and could’ve focused on something much more serious and worthwhile, like learning the dance moves to “Beat It.”

user-pic

The question is: Can the rest of us afford to live in a society constantly auditioning to make an ass of itself on TV?

http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/12/16/guido-beach-meets-the-great-relearning/

Donate