Opinion: Letter

Bargnes’ bitter bashing barely bearable

My name is Greg Downey, and I’m the current director of the UW-Madison School of Journalism & Mass Communication. In the spirit of full disclosure, I’m also one of the regular instructors of the 4-credit Comm-B course “J201: Introduction to Mass Communication” referenced in Kevin Bargnes’ opinion piece from Monday, January 25, 2010 entitled “UW journalism school classes should be updated, revamped.”

We in SJMC absolutely welcome civil and constructive student discussion, critique and suggestions concerning our courses and curriculum. Besides the formal student evaluations of every course we run, we regularly survey both our incoming and graduating majors, we solicit constant feedback from our undergraduate advising staff, we direct and support student projects to survey and analyze our curriculum and we hold biannual meetings with a distinguished alumni Board of Visitors drawn from all areas of the mass communication industry to keep our educational strategies in line with industry realities. My own door and e-mail inbox ([email protected]) are always open to students who wish to discuss our school and the education they receive. And we never stop challenging ourselves to improve our curriculum. Just this month the chair of our Undergraduate Curriculum Committee attended a Poynter Institute seminar on “A New Curriculum for A New Journalism” — where, not coincidentally, our longtime instructor for J202, Katy Culver, was personally invited to make a presentation on “ensuring the vitality of multimedia journalism in our curricula.”

However, I do not welcome mean-spirited attacks on our work as presented in Bargnes’ opinion piece. The author characterizes J201 as a “weeding out” course when it actually serves over 350 students each semester who are seeking their Comm-B requirement, about 200-250 of which then go on to apply to our major. The author characterizes J202 as “obnoxious, uninspiring, rushed and unfocused” when the scores from a decade of student course evaluations consistently rank it above our department averages (which are already high, about 4.25 out of 5.00 over the last decade) in terms of organization, instructor effectiveness and learning outcomes. But my greatest objection to the piece is the insinuation that our teaching assistants are somehow unqualified for their duties. We attract and recruit the very top graduate students in mass communication from across the nation, and of this elite group, only the highest performing students from our own program are granted the chance to work in the classroom with instructors and undergraduates. We take their training and evaluation extremely seriously and we do an excellent job of it, as their consistent success on the job market in teaching positions around the country (and around the world) demonstrates.

In short, I am dismayed the Badger Herald decided to launch an attack rather than open a conversation.

I invite all readers of the Badger Herald to explore the structure of both J201 and J202 for themselves and to enter into constructive dialogue with the instructors of each class if they wish. Here are the web addresses of both courses for the current semester:

http://www.journalism.wisc.edu/~gdowney/courses/j201/

http://www.journalism.wisc.edu/~kbculver/coursesites/j202/

Thanks,

Greg Downey

School of Journalism & Mass Communication (Professor and Director)

[email protected]

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

17 older comments

user-pic

daaaaaaaaamn

user-pic

“We attract and recruit the very top graduate students in mass communication from across the nation, and of this elite group, only the highest performing students from our own program are granted the chance to work in the classroom with instructors and undergraduates. We take their training and evaluation extremely seriously and we do an excellent job of it, as their consistent success on the job market in teaching positions around the country (and around the world) demonstrates.”

Actually, Columbia, Syracuse, Missouri, the Annenberg Schools, Northwestern and others get better prospects.

As for equating their attractiveness as grad students to their ability to teach —not quite, professor. They are chosen for their research ability, not for their teaching ability. Rather than deciding who to believe, ask your TA where they taught before they came here and how much emphasis was put on developing their teaching skills once they did get here.

Maybe the BH could survey the J201/J202 TAs and publish the results — Who could argue with that?

user-pic

You’re going to State School, not Harvard.

user-pic

I completely disagree with your statement. Last semester, I sat as a student representative at the Board of Visitors luncheon and met with some of the top journalists/strategic communication gurus in the nation (ie: managers and execs. from CNN, Monster.com, Coca Cola’s marketing division). As I sat at the University Club, the biggest takeaway I had from the lunch was the importance of ethics and theory in the newsroom/advertising office. I challenge any person to dispute that the J School does not place importance on ethics in many, if not all, of its courses.

I personally take offense to your prognosis on TAs within the Journalism School. My 202 TA busted her ass to make sure that we grew within the class. Was she a hard grader- yes. Was I pissed at times because she took off points from my assignments that I thought were ridiculous- yes. But would I ever undermine the dedication put into the course to help my peers and I develop the basic skills necessary for success in the field of journalism and strategic communication- hell no.

If you have issues with your TA, write it down in the course evaluation or speak with G Downey/another professor. The J School is small enough where you can have a conversation that will make a lasting impact on your education.

user-pic

How is what you said mutually exclusive with Downey? There are many good journalism programs out there, so what? Merely listing other excellent programs does nothing to disqualify UW from being considered one of the top programs in the nation. You can google up the academic studies yourself.

user-pic

Nobody outside the BH and DC newsrooms cares. The vast majority of undergraduate and graduate students here have never heard of the classes under discussion.

user-pic

very true, 6:23, but everyone has had the experience of TAs who don’t teach very well. The UW insists that teaching is on equal footing with research — but the facts show otherwise. That’s a concern that cuts across campus

user-pic

Hi 6:35, it’s 6:23. I’m a former TA here at the UW and couldn’t agree more with your assessment of teaching vs. research. It’s sad how little teaching matters here

What I don’t care about is some journalism major griping that their major is hard.

Oh, well. Back to researching so I can get my PhD and make a better balance between teaching and research.

user-pic

Well done, Professor Downey. Perfect use of the official UW response-to-criticism template: emphasize how your door is always open, deflect attention from the argument with iffy statistics, and express indignation that anyone would deign to criticize. You’re a credit to the university’s press strategy.

user-pic

If anything we’ve learned that Kevin is pretty dumb for launching a public attack against the school and professors that will ultimately determine his career viability. I mean, I could see him publishing this as a spring-semester senior. But after just taking j202? Not wise. I wonder if Kevin thinks professors will round his grades up after he basically called them worthless. Time to transfer to the b-school, bub.

user-pic

Word around the J-school is that Downey sent an anxious all-staff and faculty e-mail at 6 a.m. the day this came out basically telling them to ignore the Herald’s criticism and that they were the best of the best. Additionally, someone in J202 told me that Katy Culver led off her first J202 lecture of the semester with “Now, I know some of you may have read the Badger Herald this morning…” and basically said she was disappointed in the way her course was characterized.

Sounds like a pretty rapid PR response… If the journalism department is truly as outstanding and infallible as Downey suggests, why launch into a full-on damage control campaign, rather than simply letting the quality of the courses speak for themselves?

user-pic

To 2:01 pm, the reason they don’t launch a full-on damage control campaign is because the courses DON’T always speak for themselves. Rather than address anything that was brought up in the column, Downey has taken the whiny, childish way of dealing with it. Yeah, somebody was critical of what you guys do, so you attack him for being too mean?

Grow a fucking pair, Downey. This is a prime example of poor leadership. If Baughman were still supreme leader of the J-School, as many would prefer, the response would be been both snarky AND substantive. Instead, Downey took the coward’s way out—attack the kid who wrote it and hope everybody forgets about it.

Greg, stick to your Wiimotes and leave the real PR to people who actually know what the hell they’re doing.

user-pic

Although I thought Kevin Bargnes’s op-ed was a humorously lame attempt at taking on an issue, at least he had the guts to attach his name to his opinion… as did Greg Downey with his response.

Interestingly, the person who suggested Downey “grow a pair” apparently missed the irony of being afraid to sign his or her own name to their unhelpful personal attack.

It’s easy to express an anonymous opinion. It’s also gutless and, to me, greatly lessens the value of the comment.

Grow a pair indeed.

user-pic

Not mentioned in either Downey’s response nor any of the comments is that this semester, Professor Downey began a new course/colloquium for graduate students specifically to focus on classroom teaching and use of a wide variety of instructional materials to enhance the learning process for students.

As a student in this class, I know first hand Downey’s efforts to further enhance the teaching capabilities of the j-school’s grad students. To slag Professor Downey like 2:40 did shows that person doesn’t really have a current or accurate view of Downey’s leadership… leadership that I find strong, impressive, and refreshing.

user-pic

@2:01 pretty much only got the time of Greg’s e-mail correct. An e-mail to faculty and staff is hardly a campaign. Communicating within an organization is “internal communications,” not “public relations,” anyway. Huge difference.

user-pic

“However, I do not welcome mean-spirited attacks on our work as presented in Bargnes� opinion piece.”

Yeah, mean-spirited attacks are only to be allowed by certified “journalists” and the only allowable targets are conservatives!

user-pic

Downey you’re amazing. J-school, you’re amazing. I am a senior in the J-school and I talk about how obsessed I am with my major every day. I have never had a bad professor or TA, and I feel I gained so much knowledge from even the classes I hated while taking. I feel I have so many tools to become successful at what I want to do after college, and I believe I owe it to the amazing faculty in the J-school. Thank you Journalism school. You’re amazing

Donate