Opinion

On Ryan’s map, X could mark presidency

Post-electoral hangovers can often end up feeling like a bad Sunday morning for defeated political parties. This has proven to be the case for the Republican Party, as it has struggled to recover from its rough night in November 2008. With the 2010 midterms on the horizon, the party is currently looking for new leaders and a new vision that can serve as the coffee and greasy food hangover cure it desperately craves.

Now I am not exactly comparing him to a McDonald’s Big Mac, but one of the first Republican politicians to emerge on the national stage with an idea more substantial than the Party of No’s usual fare is Wisconsin’s very own Congressional Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Janesville. Ryan’s forte is fiscal policy, so his idea of choice is a Jan. 26 Wall Street Journal articulation of a GOP budget plan that counters President Obama’s efforts to turn the United States into Sweden. The document, titled “A Road Map for America’s Future,” has made Ryan’s name known on the national stage and may prove to be the money road for his own future.

The main Republican voices to emerge during the first year of the Obama presidency have been money-coveting hacks, such as Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, who make Alan Keyes look like a policy wonk. Congressional Republicans have not been better, with leaders John Boehner and Mitch McConnell taking their D.A.R.E. education a little too seriously in saying “no” to everything the Democratic Congress proposes. This strategery may prove to be successful in the 2010 midterms, but for the sake of the nation, hopefully the Republican Party will have to develop an idea more hefty than “no” to win in November.

With the Republican leadership providing little substance, Rep. Ryan’s Road Map has made him a focal point in the national debate over the growing federal deficit. Political platitudes do not create good debate, so putting forth an actual plan is a bold step that cannot help but bring attention. Paul Krugman used his New York Times opinion column to criticize the plan, and President Obama even gave Ryan a SO during his speech at last month’s GOP retreat.

Representative Ryan is an ambitious and charismatic politician who has already proven his dedication to the issue of federal fiscal policy. His decision to publish his Road Map is reminiscent of a bold move by another ambitious politician seeking to rise within a devastated Republican Party. That other Republican was none other than Tricky Dick: Richard Nixon.

Prior to this summer, I knew Richard Nixon only as the “I am not a crook” guy. That changed after I read Rick Perlstein’s “Nixonland,” which is an epic story of Nixon’s rise to the presidency (I really mean epic, not the Californian bastardization of the word.) One striking thing about Nixon described in the book is that he was a hella shrewd politician who excelled in the game of politics.

After electoral defeats in 1960 and 1962, Nixon waited patiently through the Goldwater debacle while slowly plotting his return to power within the GOP. In 1966, with the Vietnam War raging, Nixon published a critique of President Johnson’s handling of the war in The New York Times. In articulating a Republican criticism of Vietnam, Nixon established himself as Johnson’s primary foe in the Vietnam debate and a legitimate contender for the White House in 1968.

Clearly, the federal deficit does not have the same gravitas as Vietnam did, but Rep. Ryan’s insertion of himself into the national debate on an important issue was still a bold move. It now remains to be seen if the move will pay off for him as it did for Richard Nixon in 1968.

There are those folks who would argue that making an entrance on the national stage with a budget plan built on the philosophy of Ayn Rand is not exactly a political winner, as Ryan’s Road Map includes plans to privatize Medicare and Social Security along with a decent number of tax cuts. However, this is just the kind of anti-government talk that has been revving up the Republican base during the Tea Party extravaganza brewing across the country.

I have no idea how Ryan’s type of thinking will play on the streets, so I will leave it to my colleague Jim and the next edition of “Allard Shrugged” to tell you about the awesomeness of the Road Map and how it is going to propel Rep. Ryan to GOP super-stardom. What I do know is that such a political gambit that makes a politician a debating partner of the opposing party has worked in the past, so perhaps the Road Map will work for Wisconsin’s Rep. Ryan as well.

Zachary Schuster ([email protected]) is a graduate student studying water resources engineering and water resources management.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

8 older comments

user-pic

And the Herald continues to publish pieces that are sub-high school newspapers. But all that aside.

1) I wouldn’t consider the Republican Party in a post-election hangover any longer. You could have said that a year ago though. Parties in political ‘hangovers’ do not win elections in, say, Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts; let alone elections.

2) The Republican Party has not been the party of ‘no’ nor obstructionist. Party leaders such as Boehner and McConnell, along with the rest of the GOP behind the likes of Ryan, crafted alternative proposals to those being offered by Pelosi and Reid. These proposals were not taken seriously by the President nor the Democrats in Congress. He did pay lip service to some of them though during his talk to America about health care moment last fall. Such ideas they were positing included tort reform and purchasing health care across state lines.

3) Road Map for America debuted back during the summer of 2008, days before John McCain visited Greendale, WI on a campaign stump. So his WSJ op-ed isn’t something new. It’s just tweaked to fit the contemporary.

4) A juxtaposition to Nixon? Really? I understand you are comparing the two in the sense of ‘political positioning’ but Ryan is no Nixon. Nixon had a hard-on for the White House, Ryan does not. Furthermore, if Ryan was so focused on power grabs why isn’t he going for larger offices that would only enhance his chances for the Presidency? Here in WI there will be a gubernatorial race and even a Senate race. Either of those two offices would give him a larger plank to spring from a la Nixon. Granted his position in the House does grant him more (federal) political power than being a Junior Senator or a lowly governor but people that aren’t political junkies don’t grasp this.

5) This is how Ryan’s thinking will play out on the streets, as you so eloquently put it. It won’t. What he puts forth would really decrease the deficit and size of government but a majority of citizens, namely the elderly, won’t go along with it. That’s the reality.

user-pic

Ryan’s plan would upset the old people, but it would also balance the budget in the long term. College students are going to end up paying the bill for Congress’s extravagant spending in the past decade. It’s time to support a plan like Ryan’s that can actually balance the budget.

user-pic

I like Paul Ryan, I think a run for President before 2016 or 2020 might be unlikely though. Hopefully he unseats Kohl in 2012, or Kohl wises up and retires. Then maybe give the primaries a shot in 2016, or if a Republican is in office, wait until 2020. Even then he’d still only be 50 years old, which is pretty young.

user-pic

Yeah Sweden…Yeah Socialism, or wait does that mean that Americans may have to change their mongering lifestyles and consumption and ways of choosing healthy lifestyles whilst it cramps the freedoms and liberties that this great democracy has built up for us. (irony) Social Democracy is nothing to fear, especially when you believe and see that your tax money could possibly go towards something worthwhile.

user-pic

“so I will leave it to my colleague Jim and the next edition of �Allard Shrugged� to tell you about the awesomeness of the Road Map and how it is going to propel Rep. Ryan to GOP super-stardom. “

That’s a terrible misunderstanding of what both Allard and Rep. Ryan stand for.

user-pic

http://atlanticsentinel.com/2010/02/paul-ryans-free-market-crusade/

Ryan is a Randroid. Allard is founder of UW Randroids.

How is that a terrible minunderstanding?

user-pic

The author is just another sad example of liberals who fail to recognize that Conservatives actually have some competence. The Republicans have learned from their mistakes from 2006 and 2008. They abandoned their values, their conservative values which most Americans embrace. 2010 will be very successful for republicans, they have organized, and successfully defined themselves as the party of less government and less spending. They’ve developed strong alternative solutions to the liberal agenda that is being rammed down our throats right now. I think they have a little bit more than “a little substance.”

And what exactly is wrong with these “money-coveting” Republicans to emerge as leaders? Sarah Palin demonstrates very sound fiscal responsibility and represents the views of most conservatives, and actually doesn’t live under a rock like Katie Couric would want you to think. Also, if being “money-coveting” means you aren’t a tax-and-spend liberal fear monger that passes trillion dollar stimulus packages that will cost every American over $50,000 through their lifetime, I think that’s a title that the likes of Palin and Beck are happy to have.

user-pic

“The conservative values most Americans embrace”? I don’t mean to be dismissive of your opinion, but this assumption of yours seems pretty flimsy on its face, and becomes all the more obviously untrue as you look into the substance, not to mention polling numbers.

Donate