Check the NHL out these days and you'll find a drastically different game from the pre-lockout days. Although I must admit bringing this up at the end of the second season since the rules changed is a touch belated, it's still important enough to take a look at the evolution after the fact.
After the entire 2004-05 season was cancelled, the NHL, similar MLB after the 2002 All-Star game resulted in a 7-7 tie, demanded a change. To recover its fan base, who may have taken flight, professional hockey made a number of modifications to the laws of the sport with the intent of making the game more offensively oriented.
To allow more freedom for the skilled speed players to work, grabbing, holding, hooking, slashing, tripping, cross checking and interference now warrant an automatic penalty. Another rule affecting the pace of the game was the legalization of the two-line pass. This alteration gives these finesse players a chance to receive passes from their own zone in transition and, consequently, more scoring opportunities. Shootouts, goalie movement and equipment restrictions, increased fines for fighters, smaller neutral zones and varying icing restrictions are some of the other differences found in the post-lockout NHL game.
Two Fridays ago, Pittsburgh center Sidney Crosby, 19, became the youngest player in NHL history to record 200 points, breaking Wayne Gretzky's 27-year-old record. Crosby, who doesn't turn 20 until Aug. 7, beat out the Great One by more than four months, as Gretzky didn't do the same until just before his 20th birthday. Whether Crosby's success is wholly due to the recent rule changes and more open-style hockey seen in the game today or just a miraculous talent not seen since Gretzky himself was a second-year player, or a combination of both, isn't transparent. But for the rest of the league and the smaller, quicker players like Crosby, the new rules almost undoubtedly play to their advantage.
"I think it suits me a lot better with the new rule changes," former Badger Joe Pavelski, who is a rookie with the San Jose Sharks, said in a phone interview. "Not being as big of a guy (5-foot-11, 195 pounds), I'm able to get around, find my way around the rink a little bit more easily, and then I think I would have been able to with all the clutching and grabbing; so I mean, I might not be in the NHL right now with the old rules, you never know.
"Every player has kind of benefited in his own standpoint, and it has brought a lot of new fans and a lot more excitement to the game."
The fans seem to be enjoying the modifications as well. Compared to 2003-04, the last year before the lockout, the fan base has increased more than 300 fans per game (16,847 versus 16,533). It's not a huge difference, but the fact that more people are showing up to the rink despite enduring an unnecessary year without hockey bodes well.
And there's no question that the rule changes have paid off in terms of what the NHL was trying to do: The game is faster-paced, higher scoring and even penalties are down. Teams take 29.6 shots per game on average, 1.6 more than in 2003-04; combined scores have increased from five goals per contest to just fewer than six goals per contest, and penalty minutes per game have declined more than three minutes for each side.
While the shift to a higher scoring game and more freedom on offense has been beneficial in keeping the NHL a successful business, blue liners and goaltenders face a lot more pressure. Overall, though, they also agree with the tweaks and alterations.
"If you're a defenseman, it's not very good when the other team knocks the puck in and your forwards can't hold the guys up so they just come full speed at you," Edmonton Oilers rookie defenseman Tom Gilbert said. "But I think for the most part, the new rules have benefited me."
So even if my call to order is a tad late, the NHL's board of governors deserves a congratulatory applause for redeeming itself and saving the league.
Kevin is a junior double majoring in journalism and economics. If you or someone you know wants to discuss the talent phenom Sidney Crosby possesses, he can be reached at [email protected]





IP hash: fc1841e5
I can’t believe that some people think that all the new rule changes have been for the best. They are not true fans of Canadian hockey. I have a hard time watching a single game whether its MJH or NHL. I grew up with the love of seeing hard hits and few penalties. A two man advantage was abnormal and exciting and now its boring. They have turned the players into back-turning cowards. The players are taking one for the team by turning their backs to the play just to take a penalty. You would never see that in real hockey.Why are we throwing our game away for a few winers that know little about hockey. This reminds me of the politician who have voted for gun control on the few people who actually use them resposibly. Its only the ignorant people that squack the loudest and the rational say nothing. A true hockey fan understands the integrety of the game. Bring back the enforcer and get rid of the stupid instigator rule. If you take away the hitting from behind there will be no hitting from behind. Thats just common sense that people will have their heads up if there is no penalty. The player are making a mockery of the rules. Only criminals use guns illegally and do you think they care if they are registered. Come on people, wake up.I can’t believe that people are that stupid. There must be some thing else driving these ideas . Because common sense hase no part in it.
IP hash: 8d5b4f53
The new rules have been for the better.It has made the game faster.Its more exciting because the good players can show what they can do, instead of the players that can just hit and cant handle a puck!I love the new rules, and it does make it harder for defenseman but thats tough, there good enough to adapt to the changes.Thats why there in the NHL!
IP hash: 8d5b4f53
The game is better this way.Its more exciting to watch personaly, and we can really see how good these guys really are!
IP hash: 03283900
You know what? Not everyone is Canadian. I believe the rule changes did what they were intended to do, and statistics show that the NHL is still on an upward budget trend that has been moving forward since about 1987. Bottom Line- The rule changes are good as long as they accelerate the game, which these ones have succeeded to do!!!